sometimes but rarely
Absolute rulers tended to rule without Parliament.
So Europeans could rule more countries and states.
Nefrititi was the most popular, and if I'm not mistaken, the only woman to ever rule Egypt.
No, not all of the African countries were independent of outside rulers at the time of 1860. South Africa, for example, was still ruled by Great Britain for many years after.
Unlike the earlier rulers who used brutality and force to rule, today's rulers are more civilized and look for better ways of resolving conflicts. Hunting and gathering has also stopped as modern people embrace new ways of development.
-Same- both wanted to modernize for the benefit of there country -Different- Africa allowed Imperial rule Muslim Countries didnt allow imperial rule
-Same- both wanted to modernize for the benefit of there country -Different- Africa allowed Imperial rule Muslim Countries didnt allow imperial rule
very carefully
Republics do not have rulers.
No country has ever managed to rule all of Europe
The rule of law requires that the rulers be subject to the same laws as the subjects. "Impunity" is immunity from the sanctions of law: allowing the rulers to act with impunity defies the rule of law.
Tribute