Well technically, no. Not real cells. But some examples of non-living things with "cells" could be jail (a jail cell) or an excel spreadsheet. I hope this helps!
Non-living things do not have cells. But if an object/organism was once alive it could still have a few dying cells, depending on the time of "death".
False
Everything is ultimately created from non-living things.
they all have atoms
All known living things have cells. There are many non-living things that do not have cells.
I'm not 100% sure but i believe the pollen is living
that living things can breath and non living things cant
Nonliving THINGS do not contain cells, however ALL THINGS, whether living or non-living, do contain atoms.
Non-living things do not have cells. Cells are the fundamental unit of life - meaning only living things are made of cells.
The building blocks of living things are cells and of non-living things are molecules.
Living things have cells non-living things dont
They both have particles. The particles that living things have are called cells.
Do you mean how are living things different from non-living? If yes, living things have cells, give off wastes, and some other stuff.
Non living. Living things are active without a key. Also, living things have to be able to... react to their environment, or homeostasis.
There are none. Having cells is what makes something living
Cells are a feature of living things.
non-living cells
There is no such thing as a "non-living" cell. If you are referring to living things being produces by non-living sources that would be abiogenesis.
The cell is the basic unit of living organisms. Since non-living things are not made of cells, the number is irrelevant. yes