Yes they do, constitutional monarchy runs elections which lets people to get to vote. Every legal citizen has a right to say.
In an absolute monarchy, only the monarch has power, so everyone other than the monarch has no power. In a constitutional monarchy, who is deprived of power depends entirely on the constitution in question.
Oh, dude, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution, so technically they don't have much say in how the country is run. It's more like they're there for show, like a fancy ornament on a cake. So yeah, people in a constitutional monarchy have some say, but the real power lies with the elected government.
Limited monarchy gives more power to the people. The gorvernment has more control. In an absolute monarchy, the king, queen, or president has all of the power, and "the poeple" dont get any say in what goes on, until there is a reelection.
People had more say in laws that were created and the senate was created.
hereditary monarchy was correct becuase people believe in heretiry right in a hereditary monarchy
Many people wanted Monarchy
Italy used to be a monarchy which is a country ruled by kings and queens
An absolute monarchy can, in fact, be quite dangerous. A benevolent monarchy may have the welfare of its people in mind; but there is no guarantee that it will remain benevolent over time.
it took away power from the monarchy and gave people a say, by givig power to parliament
Subjects, Vassals or Serfs.
The people in a monarchy follow the rule of law the same as people in other systems do. The difference comes from how the laws are created, since in a monarchy laws are handed down by royalty, while in a democracy the laws are determined by the people and their representatives.
A nation run for the people,by the people, with no monarchy.