David Tytler has written: 'Strong associated C IV absorption in low redshift quasars' -- subject(s): Absorption spectra, Interstellar gas, Quasars, Stellar spectra
That they are receding at more than 90% the speed of light, and that they are not stars in our galaxy because we can't see change.
cons quasars have have large red shift that suggest they are far away as distant galexies some quazars with very high redshifts appear to be interacting with other galexies that have lesser redshift which would suggest that quazars have ann in trensic redshift pros its perfect evidence to show that the universe is expanding
The evidence for the extreme distance is the extreme redshift. Also, in many cases, a coincidence has been found between a quasar and a galaxy.The evidence for the extreme distance is the extreme redshift. Also, in many cases, a coincidence has been found between a quasar and a galaxy.The evidence for the extreme distance is the extreme redshift. Also, in many cases, a coincidence has been found between a quasar and a galaxy.The evidence for the extreme distance is the extreme redshift. Also, in many cases, a coincidence has been found between a quasar and a galaxy.
That is called "redshift".That is called "redshift".That is called "redshift".That is called "redshift".
Quasars still exist.
quasars
Quantum Redshift happened in 2002.
The Redshift was created on 2008-09-22.
No. Quasars are at the centers of distant galaxies.
Redshift does not expand the universe. Redshift is a physical quantity that is used to describe the expansion of the universe. The current time has a redshift of zero. at redshift 1, the universe was half the size it is now. At redshift 2, the universe was 1/3 the size it is now, and so on. if redshift is z, then (size of universe at redshift z)/(current size of universe)= 1/(z+1)
Quasars are thought to be distant super-massive black holes.