No they do not
Gert K. Hirschberg has written: 'Cases on the law of products liability' -- subject(s): Cases, Products liability
In most cases a lender will file a notace of default after 3 missed payments.
No, the doctrine of strict liability can apply to a variety of other situations beyond just abnormally dangerous activity. These may include certain product liability cases, activities involving animals, and some cases of harmful conduct or behavior. In strict liability cases, the defendant can be held liable for damages without having to prove negligence or intent.
In most cases, YES
with aid of cases statutory discusses the concept of strict liability and vicarious liability How does this make sense?
I think Actual Authority has greater liability because in cases of apparent authority in many cases the liabilities are shared by the parties involved i.e the parties other than the plaintiff.
Professional liability cases have been increasing greatly in the past few years. Professions such as high rise owners have seen many of these lawsuits.
The lender loans money to the borrower.The borrower takes the loan out with the lender.The borrower is then in debt (owes money) to the lender and the lender is in credit with the borrower and will want the borrower to pay him/her back.
In really depends on the different states. In most cases, the answer should be no, that you do not need such a license. To be sure, check with your state regulators.
A money lender offers consumer small personal loans that usually carry a high interest rate. In most cases these loans are made to people with a poor credit history.
In some cases this is governed by state law, in other cases by the rules of the lender themselves. You would have to discuss this with your lender. In general, it would usually be better to do it through them. Certainly easier!
You can find a product liability lawyer in the local phone book, There are multiple websites that offer a list of good lawyers in your area.