No.
Reptiles have a more complex heart than amphibians. Here's a brief comparison: Amphibians (like frogs and toads): Have a three-chambered heart: two atria and one ventricle Oxygenated and deoxygenated blood mix in the ventricle Less efficient oxygen delivery to body tissues Reptiles (like snakes, lizards, and crocodiles): Have a three- or four-chambered heart (depending on the species) Three-chambered heart: two atria and one ventricle (similar to amphibians) Four-chambered heart
Yes! there's more venomous Amphibians than Reptiles.
Dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than to amphibians. In fact, dinosaurs are classified as reptiles. Amphibians are lower on the evolutionary tree than reptiles. Reptiles developed from amphibians. Amphibians developed from fish.
Crocodiles are a group of reptiles and they do not belong to the amphibians. Reptiles are a more recent groep of animals compared to the amphibians.
monkey fish=2 amphibians = 3 reptiles=3.5 birds and mammals=4
Amphibians and most reptiles possess a three-chambered heart, which consists of two atria and one ventricle. This heart structure allows for some mixing of oxygenated and deoxygenated blood, which is less efficient than the four-chambered heart found in birds and mammals. Some reptiles, like crocodilians, have a more advanced heart with a partial separation of the ventricle, but the typical three-chambered heart is characteristic of amphibians and most other reptiles.
Neither...They were reptiles. dinosaurs were nether amphibians or mammals they were all reptiles, though they are more closely related to birds.
Reptiles
lay shelled eggs
because their limbs and bones are stronger than those of amphibians
I suppose they are part of the lizard family... to put it more specific I would say they are amphibious reptiles.
They are generally considered reptiles, though some think they should have their own class.