Well it depends....
when you first started at school your parents will have signed a form agreeing to your photograph being taken
if they have not signed a form then yes it is against your rights :)
Students have no rights. The school stands in lieu of the parents when the students are at school and the parents have all the rights when they are home. So, to answer your question no one who is a student benefits.
They don't, you always maintain your own CIVIL rights (i.e.: the rights guaranteed to you by the US Constitution) wherever you go.Added: What you are probably referring to is your feeling of loss of "privileges" and/or the application of "discipline" for committing infractions against school "rules."
Education is the rights! It's simple to answer this question!
High school students have First Amendment rights because the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that free speech and expression are fundamental rights that extend to minors in educational settings. Landmark cases, such as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, established that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." However, these rights can be limited if the speech disrupts the educational process or infringes on the rights of others. Thus, while students enjoy First Amendment protections, they are balanced against the school's responsibility to maintain a conducive learning environment.
15%
Rights come with responsibility. Some of your rights are: 1 the right to be educated. 2 the right to be treated equally and with respect by both staff member and peers. For more info on rights of students, please visit your school or school board website.
"A Legitimate Expectation Of Privacy." but at the same time the school has to protect the students and faculty.
Michael Bochenek has written: 'Hatred in the hallways' -- subject(s): School violence, Homophobia in schools, Violence against, Gay rights, Sexual minority students
If you mean for blind students to use, you're not very funny. Better clarify your question or remove it.
yes it is
HELP ME!!!!!!!!!! pwease
The take-away lesson is not that "protesting in school" is bad, but that the school can't punish students for expressing their opinions, even if the opinion is unpopular. Protests are acceptable as long as they aren't disruptive and don't interfere with other people's rights. The school can't preemptively infringe students' rights simply because they fear a peaceful expression of protest might cause problems.BackgroundTinker v. Des Moines involved three students who were suspended from school for wearing black armbands as a passive protest against the United States' involvement in Viet Nam. The students weren't disruptive, and their behavior didn't interfere with the school's educational mission or interfere with other people's rights. They were punished simply because the school disapproved of their expression of opinion. (Oddly, the same school permitted students to wear jewelry displaying Nazi symbols.)The Court held that First Amendment protection adhered in school because the Fourteenth Amendment selectively applied the Bill of Rights to the states, and were not abandoned in the school environment. "First Amendment rights, applied in light of the special characteristics of the school environment, are available to teachers and students. It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."The Supreme Court supported students' right to the expression of opinion, even controversial opinion, in the school environment, but did not abrogate the school's right to maintain appropriate order and discipline.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)For more information about Tinker v. Des Moines, see Related Questions, below.