Yes, they do.
I do not think there is anything that does not require matter. Matter has mass, and mass is the same as energy, so if something does not have mass or energy, it does not exist. Even the smallest elementary particle, the muon neutrino, has energy; therefore it has mass; therefore it is matter.
Without energy you cannot move,think or even exist, the sun wouldnt exist, nothing would exist.
no
Scientists think quasars are supermassive black holes in the process of consuming enormous amounts of matter.
Scientists believe that there is liquid water, under the crust of Europa.
I suppose that you think to physicists.
love still exist but you may not see it.Love still is beautiful if you have it.you may think it but love still exist no matter what.
no..nevore..because he is a scientist not student...hekhek.. jwk...i think maybe..
The more energy, the more damage it can cause.
7 I think
I think the question is a bit mixed up, but I think this is the answer. Scientists talk about "mass-energy" as a unified thing. Just after the Big Bang "energy", in the form of radiation energy, was dominant. However, today it seems that "mass" is the dominant form. In other words, "matter" now dominates the Universe. There is the complication of "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy". Cosmologists still don't really know what these are. So that puts some uncertainty into this discussion of matter and energy. Some scientists believe that it is now "energy" that dominates, because of the discovery of Dark Energy. (Also, cosmologists think that both "matter" and "anti-matter" were created, but that there was a slight imbalance in favour of matter and the anti-matter seems to have been destroyed, leaving just "matter".)
where scientist think Stegosaurus livem