It's not possible to say based on our current knowledge. It is likely that the earliest forms of life replicated using RNA rather than DNA.
In glass vessels in the Lab we have, not all that easily, combined substances that produced Rna particles capable of, if not self-replication, then the replication of other Rna strands in the same solution.
With DNA being as fragile as a strand of fiberglass, and as such it cannot exist without being wound around histone proteins, this shows that Rna Way came first.
DNA I think
yes
This statement is false. Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty concluded that genes are made of DNA.
because RNA depend to DNA.
The field of genetic engineering or recombinant DNA technology was created when recombined DNA was first made in the 1970s. This technology allows scientists to manipulate and modify genes, creating genetically modified organisms for various applications in medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology.
Rosalind Franklin
the first dna model was made in 1953 by james watson
Watson and Crick did with the discovery of the strucure of the DNA molecule in 1953 but the first GMO had been made in the 70's in California, by Americans scientists. =)
the first non mammal clone was made in 1952 but i dont kno what it was however i think it was just DNA (the first mammal was dolly the sheep not sure when though)
If you think about it, it sort of is. But what scientists can't replicate is the creation of the original DNA. What scientists do is twist god's creation by taking the DNA of another creature, sticking that DNA in an egg cell, and place the egg cell in the original DNA doner.
Scientists discovered chromosomes in DNA
yeah..i think