no.
Many people will be very strong on the evidence that snakes once had legs. Some breeds even have a bone that could have been used for legs. The bible says in Genisis that God punished snakes to crawl on their bellies. Dr. Grimm
0 snakes do not have legs.
This is considered evidence for evolution because vestigial structures like legs in snakes suggest that they have evolved from ancestors that had functional legs. These structures are no longer needed for survival, but their presence supports the idea of common ancestry and evolutionary change over time.
snakes don't have legs they only slither
no they do not have legs
No, anaconda are snakes and they do not have legs.
they have no legs
Legs.
The different of lizards and snakes is very easy. Snakes are known to have no arms, hands, legs or feet in their body. Snakes are litteraly a muscle with a spinal cord. Lizards do hav all of this exept they have arms and legs. Some lizards do look like snakes but they are not.
No
Only the bindsnake, otherwise, no snakes have legs, even if they are developing an egg.
are you talking about snakes or millipide? different person: if you are talking about milipedes...then they have roughly a 1000 legs not always, but around 1000 legs. =)