answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Equality Rights or Equal Rights are the ideas of men based upon the application of Marx & Engels as well as Hegel's dialectics. That's the first point you must understand. What value is there if everything becomes an equal right with equal results? Common sense provides that there is no value in equality rights. This system of equality rights is based upon soviet tacts of subversion and active measures. Simply promising equality to all, eliminates human incentive. Why make the effort if the result is always going to be based on some obscure human measurement or determination of equality? Humans will never strive to achieve and become stagnant under equality rights as defined by Marxist and Hegelian dialectics.

Our Father nor Christ promised equality of rights nor results. In every case each individual must earn their right, it is not given. Judgement is equal among all men, for we are all judged according to our works (Revelation 20). Equality rights disincentives populations, it is a soviet tactic of subversion and active measures.

in biblical text, what did our Father say?
Our Father always uses a Qualifier in his statements. In many cases he will use the word IF, in all cases he requires conditions to any agreement. Read the covenant in Genesis 17:1, where the condition for Abraham was "walk before me and be thou perfect" which is followed by And I will .... notice the qualifier? If Abraham had not met the qualifier then the covenant would not stand, because the qualifications had not been met. Therefore Our Father requires you to earn what he has promised to provide by meeting the qualifier ... Our Father did not offer Abraham equality to obtain the covenant, neither did he offer it to anyone else, he made Abraham work to earn the achievement, which was the covenant.

Read Luke 12:47-48, Does Christ proclaim everyone to be equal there? No ... He states to whom much is given, much is expected, there is again a qualifier of earning which is not based upon using the dialect definition of equality. What good would it do for Christ to let his will be known to a soul which he knows is fragile and incapable? This would mean Christ would be forced to chastise a soul he knew could not handle the job in the first place... understand?

Do you give the job of surgeon to anyone based upon equality?
Do you give the job of a Structural Engineer to anyone based upon equality?
In both these cases the selection of the wrong person based upon equality rights, could have disastrous results.

Finally read 2 Thessalonians chapter 3. There Paul will tell you they did not eat a mans bread for nought (equality rights to food), they worked for it, Paul was a tent maker.


Use common sense, Equality rights are the ideas of men, they are not supported by biblical text, and neither should they be. Its disinsentive and demoralizing to award based simply upon equality of rights and not upon achievement. The one achieving stands as a shining example to others that a specific goal can be achieved if they work for it and they have the aptitude to understand it. Common sense shows you all will never possess the incentive nor the aptitude, to achieve everything, therefore its disingenuous to expect all to have the right to every achievement based upon equality.

Personally, I am not sports oriented, so why would it be fair for me to posses the equal right to become part of someone else's sports achievements? The same can be said of every personal achievement?

We all have the opportunity to pursue a relationship with our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and there are conditions to that relationship. However we do not posses equal right to share in the works of those who have nurtured a relationship with Christ. while we on our own have done nothing as part of that work.

Revelation 20 describes this in detail as we are all individually Judged according to our Works, which is the profound answer to your question. As you stand as an individual before the Lord God of Israel on Judgement day, you are judged according to your own individual works. You are not judged upon the basis of some obscure rights you assume to posses, related to the good or evil works of others, through equality. In that judgment lies both your answer and your reasoning.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do the Christian views go against equality rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What were the views of segregation of NAACP?

The NAACP's views on segregation was they wanted equality for housing, voting, education, and all other human rights as a race that they were denied.


What is NAACP views on segregation?

Being a civil rights organization, the NAACP would be against segregation. They were among the groups fighting for school integration in the 1960s.


Christian views on fornicaion?

The Christian or biblical view of fornication is that it is sinful. The Bible teaches that sex outside of marriage is against the law of God.


What does the word vindication mean in the context of Wollstonecraft title?

In the context of Mary Wollstonecraft's title "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman," the word vindication means defending or justifying the rights of women to equality and education, and proving that they are deserving of these rights. The book argues against the prevailing views of the time that women were inherently inferior to men and advocates for their intellectual and social empowerment.


What was Rudolf Steiner's views on equality?

He believed in a spiritual equality of all people.


What were Anne Frank's political views?

Anne Frank's diary does not extensively discuss her specific political views. However, based on her writings, she opposed discrimination and persecution, believed in the importance of human equality and rights, and expressed a desire for peace and justice.


What were NAACP views on segregation?

The NAACP were against segregation. They believed in desegregation and equal rights for all citizens. To voice their views, the NAACP staged boycotts and protests across the South.


What were the naacp's views on segregation?

The NAACP were against segregation. They believed in desegregation and equal rights for all citizens. To voice their views, the NAACP staged boycotts and protests across the South.


Why did Johnson consider the civil rights bill unconstitutional?

The civil rights bill asserted, that the civil rights of the citizen were to be protected by the federal courts against the laws of the state in which he lived. Johnson, with his states' rights views, was forced to veto the bill.


What were Karl Marx's views on freedom?

Social equality and a class-less state would achieve equality and freedom for all.


What were John Adam's views on slavery?

He abhored it, and thought it would always be a mark against a nation created as temple to equality. He was also the only founding father to never own a slave.


What were Paul Revere's religious views?

what was paul rever's religious views