The North pole and South pole are smaller than they are
The North pole and South pole are smaller than they are
Mapping a 3D object using 2D technology always distorts the relative size of the object and its features.
A globe may give you a more true idea of the size of land near -- North -- or under -- South -- the poles.
You can shop for a true, continental true-size 2D map and review the actual size of continents compared with each other.
-- There is no land area around the north pole.
-- Any projected image or printed map of a feature on the Earth's surface must
of necessity be presented in a format that is smaller than the real thing is.
Otherwise it would be quite impossible to view the mop, work with it, fold it etc.
The North pole and South pole are smaller than they are
As said below, a 2 dimensional map is a distortion- but remember there IS no land area at the North Pole. It is open ocean.
They appear smaller
If they appear at all, they're larger than they "really are", because they don't actually exist in the sense of being physical objects.Maybe you're asking a different question related to a particular type of map projection? If so, which one?
There is no relationship between overall size and penis size. A skinny guy may have an average size penis but since it is on a smaller body, it may appear larger than it really is.
The poles are not actual places, and so they don't have size. Antartica is a larger area than the Arctic. It is also a continent, whereas around the north pole the Arctic is just ice.
Yes, but a scale can also be used to show a smaller distance by using a bigger distance (i.e. the opposite of the above). For example, imagine we were drawing a representation of something really small like the structure of an atom. If we wanted to draw this accurately we would have to use a scale which uses a larger distance to represent a smaller one.
Together, the continents of Asia and Africa make up about 75,000,000 sq km. The rest of the continents together make up just under that amount. So really, they would be neither "very much" larger or smaller, but almost the same.
If they appear at all, they're larger than they "really are", because they don't actually exist in the sense of being physical objects.Maybe you're asking a different question related to a particular type of map projection? If so, which one?
low angle= to make object appear larger than it really is and to make audience vulnerable....... high angle= to make object appear smaller than what it really is and to create the effect that they are insignificant........
Macro lenses will help your camcorder see smaller images closely and can be used to make items larger than they really are.
It probably would make it seem smaller. if darker colors like Brown and dark green do, than really so would dark blue. Any dark color will make a room appear smaller because there is not much reflection of of it. White makes a room appear larger.
Yes.
Yes.
There is no relationship between overall size and penis size. A skinny guy may have an average size penis but since it is on a smaller body, it may appear larger than it really is.
Objects that are far away appear smaller than they really are.
A microscope is a scientific tool that can make objects appear larger than they really are. By using lenses to magnify the image, a microscope allows researchers to study and observe tiny structures and organisms that would otherwise be invisible to the naked eye.
No. It's really an "optical illusion". See Link for full explanation
A panda bear's tail does not shorten as it gets older. However, the fur thickens around it and the bear grows much larger than its birth size, so it may appear shorter.
There is a reason why larger companies are so successful; they are reliable. Smaller companies tend to be unreliable and of a lower quality (which is why they never expand into larger companies). You get what you pay for.