sometimes well most of the time if there under 12
Newer games are move violent and negative to those who play them. Between the years 2000 till now , the games have promoted violence, theft, and many other bad things.
Though I do not believe violent video games promote real life violence, many experts believe they do. For example, in Australia violent video games are banned, and a heavy fine is placed on those found with them.
Well, the majority of PlayStation and Xbox games are all violent unfortunately and seem to be only suitable for male teenagers. But Nintendo games are praised for their non-violent appeal. For kids and those soft at heart, Nintendo games are the way to go. For teenagers, anything but Nintendo. That is how the video game world proceeds today.
Not in my opinion. I have 2 grown sons that played those types of games when they were younger, and still play. Parents need to BE PARENTS. Limit the games to the weekends, and maybe an hour or so during that time. Other then that, tell them to get outside and play!!
Of course he did, most parents teach their children not to do those things.
Yes because I love those things (especially video games!) and my friends love those things, too
There is not a specific type of teenager that is violent.
A very low percent, if not at all. School massacres are caused by those with personality disorders, which include paranoia, suicidal, etc., even confused bullied students.
Its educational. ---------------------- Not necessarily. It depends on what and how much they're watching. Television that involves physical harm, emotional harm, bad words, drugs, and racism is a bad influence. However, lots of TV shows involve those things, and kids watch them. Television that involves the opposite of these things, such as sympathy and helping the environment, is a good influence.
Maybe Ad's, or trailers?
My dick
The study of those characteristics of locations that influence travel. Things that attract people to different locations.