yes i agree
That is a tough question. Since you are asking what I think, I'd have to go with "yes." But politics is politics. It is very hard to make politics the sport of gentlemen. It is what it is.I think your question should be: "Is politics dehumanizing." And the answer to that question is "Yes, it is."
Yes,I do agree on the statement because politics is all about the way of developing the country which the politicians do not do.
Government in America. This book is great for helping people understand the politics of America. I do not agree with all of it's views, but it does tell you how to get informed.
because by this signal would alert them from the British conquer
The question is not "do we agree with his politics". As a person, he is a very good man.
they did not agree on war economics
It is considered a parliamentary government with a one-party system.
The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.
We agree on so many things until it comes to politics, there our opinions really diverge.
Presidents and normal people not involving politics. And they go there because it is also a hotel. I kind of don't agree on that answer
For some reason, some people hate other people just because they don't agree with them. Most people who hate Mitt Romney don't agree with his policies, politics, or religion.
Unfortunately, it is quite common for people to pursue political objectives by violent means. In a more civilized world, politics would be conducted only by debating and voting. But that is not the world we live in.