yes No: I think that in most instances Dictators see the opportunity & grasp the power irrespective of the needs or desires of the people. Dictators do what thay do for their own benefit.
because people cant agree and there is evil. america fights to free those dictator countries
The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.The Roman people did not elect Caesar dictator. A dictator was an appointed position. Caesar was appointed dictator by the senate. The people had nothing to do with his office.
The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.The Roman senate had to appoint a dictator many times over its long history. They found it necessary when they could not agree on a solution to a problem that needed immediate attention.
A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.
The dictator
well the roman government created a "dictator" because it was for the use of time of extreme civil unrest.
Many people who want to change the world can be a dictator
The dictator him/her self because people are willing to follow them because of their share of beliefs and the dictator has leader qualities.
well....i guess because he would kill anyone who didnt agree with him?...he was a dictator
create a state with just enough power to serve them
create a state with just enough power to serve them.
A dictator is an overall ruler, he controls the army, the people, the government, everything.