Want this question answered?
Relativism looks at the circumstances behind moral belief.if all thigs are relative then there cannot be anything that is completely true within individuals.whereas absolutism is an ethical view that certain actions are absolutely right or absolutely wrong,regardless of the outcomes or the intentions behind the situation eg.they believe stealing is wrong in all circumstances even if someone is stealing food for a starving family
No, moral obligations are typically considered categorical rather than hypothetical. This means that we believe there are certain actions that are morally right or wrong regardless of our personal desires or circumstances.
herodotus
absolutely
Yes, "sinful" is an adjective used to describe actions or behaviors that are considered morally wrong or offensive. It refers to actions that go against religious or ethical beliefs.
It depends on the circumstances.
no, your wrong.
absolutely nothing
Ethical decision-making foundations are usually separated into three groups: God/Nature, Society, and Concrete Circumstances. People who believe it is wrong to steal "no matter what," may believe that ethics are defined for all by God/Nature. People who believe that the ethics of stealing and rights of property depend on the culture in which the person is raised have a Society oriented foundation. And, people who believe that the 'rightness' or 'wrongness' of stealing is based on the circumstance (e.g. whether or not you were starving) probably base their ethics on Concrete Circumstances.
They do not want to admit they are wrong and may not think they are in the wrong as well as we have been led to believe by society to place blame rather than take responsibility for it.
This claim is a moral claim, suggesting that it is morally wrong to choose not to vote. It pertains to ethics and the principles individuals believe should guide their actions in society.
no