Form 6251 is the alternative minimum tax for individuals form. As with all federal tax form lines asking to combine the entries on various lines, a number in parentheses is a negative number and is subtracted from positive numbers. If all you have is negative numbers, then those entries are added together. Their total then is entered within parentheses, because the total of all negative numbers is a negative number. Several lines on the 2008 Form 6251 are required by the instructions to be entered as negative numbers. That's why parentheses are included in the form on lines 6, 7, 8, 25, and 28.
No. The fact that it didn't "clear" the bank means there either wasn't enough money in the account it was written from, or whoever wrote the check called the bank and cancelled (voided) it. If you deposited a check in your account, and it doesn't clear, then you need to subtract what you added in when you made the deposit because it's as though it doesn't exist. Contact the check writer (if you can) to get a new one. If it's a deadbeat who intentionally wrote a check with insufficient funds, the authorities (and the banks) take a very dim view of this as it constitutes fraud.
You don't need to "clear your name" after Bankruptcy, the stigma isn't what it used to be. There's a common myth that once declared bankrupt you will be added to a "blacklist". There is no such blacklist. Under British law you will most likely be "clear" of you bankruptcy after 4 years, after which time you are allowed to apply for credit (if you want to), a good way to start is with a credit card with a low-limit. Use this card every month and clear the debt every pay-day, after a few months of this apply for another and then a few months later another. Make sure you pay them off. Keep this up for a maximum of 3 cards and for 1 year. This will improve your credit rating and you will probably be eligable for a loan, mortgage, etc. Be careful with your money though! Good luck, Moog.
They clear straight away.
It is usually five working days for a cheque to clear.
How long does it take to clear a change of amount of three thousand dollars.
The question is not clear
The parentheses are used in methods to specify arguments. Some methods don't use arguments; but it would in fact be more confusing, not less, to omit the parentheses in this case - because the parentheses give some kind of consistency.The parentheses also help make it clear when something written after a dot is a field, and when it is a method. For this reason, in languages that allow you to either write or not write the parentheses for methods without arguments, I would always write them, for clarity and consistency.The parentheses are used in methods to specify arguments. Some methods don't use arguments; but it would in fact be more confusing, not less, to omit the parentheses in this case - because the parentheses give some kind of consistency.The parentheses also help make it clear when something written after a dot is a field, and when it is a method. For this reason, in languages that allow you to either write or not write the parentheses for methods without arguments, I would always write them, for clarity and consistency.The parentheses are used in methods to specify arguments. Some methods don't use arguments; but it would in fact be more confusing, not less, to omit the parentheses in this case - because the parentheses give some kind of consistency.The parentheses also help make it clear when something written after a dot is a field, and when it is a method. For this reason, in languages that allow you to either write or not write the parentheses for methods without arguments, I would always write them, for clarity and consistency.The parentheses are used in methods to specify arguments. Some methods don't use arguments; but it would in fact be more confusing, not less, to omit the parentheses in this case - because the parentheses give some kind of consistency.The parentheses also help make it clear when something written after a dot is a field, and when it is a method. For this reason, in languages that allow you to either write or not write the parentheses for methods without arguments, I would always write them, for clarity and consistency.
No. (Your question not really makes sense, but the answer is clear: no)
The question is ambiguous because it is not clear where the parentheses end. -5(sqrt(64)) - 3 = 5*(±8 ) - 3 =± 40 - 3 = -43 or +37
It is not possible to answer the question because it is not clear what 75 is to be divided by.
4 x (6 - 2) + 7 = 23 Alternatively, you can insert an extra pair of parentheses: (4 x (6 - 2)) + 7 = 23 which are not strictly needed as multiply is done before add, but it does make it totally clear which operations are done when.
Just remember this phrase, please excuse my dear aunt sally, it will always be in this order, take the first letter of each word, the p in please stands for parentheses, the e in excuse stands for exponents, the m in my stands for multiplication, the d in dear stands for divide, the a in aunt stands for addition, & the s in sally stands for subtraction, so just to be clear first step is to do whats in the parentheses, 2nd step is to do the exponents, 3rd step is to multiply, 4th step is to divide, 5th step you add, and the last step you subtract, in that order.
Perform the mathematical operations, starting with the innermost set of parentheses and working out to the most inclusive set. Y2 + Z(X - 2(Y +1)) Clearing the inside set: Y2 + Z(X - 2Y + 2) Then clear the outer set: Y2 + ZX - 2ZY +2Z
The order of operations is not clear; for example, what goes into the numerator and what goes into the denominator. Please rewrite, using appropriate parentheses. For example, if there is an addition in the denominator, put parentheses around the entire denominator.
Clear
typewriter+human.It is actually very very clear
avoid.