yes, definaterly
In the first place after ww1 Germany had teritory taken from it that was valuable to its industry. When it became obvious that it was easily taken back. Hitler decided that he would take all the territory he wanted in order to build up his power.
Bulgaria was never taken by Hitler. Bulgaria and Germany were allies.
Romania was never taken by Hitler; Romania was an ally of Germany against Soviet Union invasion.
very because Hitler promised to bring peace to Germany and also to regain all of the land that was taken from them. he also promised more jobs and to bring Germany back to a powerful nation in Europe
The first country taken by Hitler's Germany was Austria, in March 1938.
Hitler began to take over Germany with the Nazi party in January 1933
Germany or denmark
He wasn't judged on his race in Switzerland or the United States but he didn't return to Germany (his birth place) because Hitler had taken control and WW2 was starting.
After WW1 germany, Italy, and Japan had dictators. Germanys was HITLER:(
The treaty of Versailles at the end of WW1 made Germany surrender much of its land.Hitler only occupied the Rhineland before the official start of the war. So pretty much everything besides Germany and the Rhineland was not taken by hitler.
No, because then Germany would have many other http://military.answers.comilitaryofficials ready to take Hitler's place.This depends on many factors, including when the assassination of Hitler takes place. If the assassination takes place before Hitler was able to unify the country, the country may not politically have been able to agree on a way to mobilize the country, nor join with Austria. Without a strong Germany, Russia would have been far less hesitant in assimilating adjoining countries such as Poland.
He promised jobs and a strong Germany. He promised that the disgrace of versaille will lose its validity. He also promised that the German territories will be taken back.