Answer
Call of Duty does have better graphics but only the newest ones. Halo's graphics beats World at War, Call of Duty 1-3, and the handheld versions for sure. Halo shouldn't be compared to Call of Duty. Should be compared to like Gears of War.
i say halo 3
halo 3 ODST is better than call of duty waw
halo reach
halo halo is awesome compared to call of duty its got better weapons and awesomer armor if it my opinion id say halo i dont know
HALO all the way.
Halo all the way!
call of duty is a batter game
Halo 3 is way better because it is way more creative,has better guns, better places and has way more glitches and better ones than call of duty's if it even has any so call of duty sucks Remember Halo 3 rules Call of duty drules
halo 3 odst is better
AnswerHonestly, more people play Call of Duty. A good decent amount of people still play Halo though.
I actually think MW3 is better. First of all its newer and I think it has better graphics than Halo Reach. Second,MW3 has more levels in campaign and a whole lot more levels in survival. (compared to Halo Reach's firefights)
Well... call of duty has killstreak rewards and classes but Halo has Forge and better graphics. It depends what king of game you like. In COD you can kill people easily and in Halo everyone has shields taking longer to kill people. But because Halo has medals, forge, thearter and good graphics I say Halo is better. Cod 5 is quite good though as it has attack dogs and zombie mode. If you were to compare Halo Reach and Cod 7, Halo Reach is miles better