Yes, but not as written. The dispute is over the control of Western Sahara. Western Sahara has no sovereign government yet, so the dispute between Morocco and the Sahraoui Polisario, a militant organization claiming to represent the Sahraoui people (the people of Western Sahara).
The Western Sahara conflict revolves around the territorial dispute between Morocco and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), which is proclaimed by the Polisario Front. Following Spain's withdrawal from the region in 1975, Morocco annexed the territory, leading to a prolonged struggle for independence by the Polisario Front. A ceasefire was established in 1991 under UN mediation, but a final resolution has not been achieved, resulting in ongoing tensions and a humanitarian crisis for the Sahrawi people. The situation remains complex, with international attention varying over time.
The leader of the pride was very territorial.
The dispute between Rupert's Land and U.S., the dispute between Massachusetts (colonial) and New Brunswick, and the dispute between Georgia and West Florida.
Nicaragua and Venezuela
It settled the dispute that Gemany and France were having in 1906 over France's attempts to gain control over Morocco.
Kashmir
Yes
In its general sence for knowledge, 'Territorial Dispute' means a conflict between parties to the dispute, over a area in physical occupation / custody of one party, but the other party, stakes claim over the same, demanding its occupation, in its side. The dispute may occure between 'Nations', 'two territories of states within one nation' and so on. Thanks.
What increase the likelihood that the states would dispute each other's claims to western territories
It was probably a territorial or food dispute between two males.
anyone who is reading this is a $hit head
To have countries unified into one country despite of differences. Look at Switzerland, Germans, French, and Italians do not engage in territorial dispute in the region, but the region has been ran autonomously.