Want this question answered?
Th Chemical Weapons Convention was ratified by Morocco at 29.04.1997.
Julian Perry Robinson has written: 'Public Health Response to Biological and Chemical Weapons' 'The effects of weapons on ecosystems' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare, Environmental aspects, Environmental aspects of Biological warfare, Environmental aspects of Chemical warfare, Environmental aspects of Military weapons, Environmental aspects of Nuclear weapons, Environmental aspects of War, Military weapons, Nuclear weapons, War 'The United States binary nerve-gas programme' -- subject(s): Asphyxiating and poisonous Gases, Chemical weapons, Military policy, War use 'Chemical and biological warfare developments, 1985' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare
No Because Chile Isn't All in On Biological Weapons.
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
J. A. F. Compton has written: 'Small farm weed control' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Control, Small Farms, Weeds 'Military chemical and biological agents' -- subject(s): Biological weapons, Chemical agents (Munitions), Chemical weapons, Herbicides, Pathogenic microorganisms, War use
No, both are legal weapons for nations to use in war. Only chemical and biological weapons are prohibited by international law (although that has not stopped certain countries from using them).
Terrorists often use bombs and bullets. They also use biological and chemical weapons.
The advantage is that chemical weapons doesn't destroy buidings. Also these weapons can be used by poor nations without nuclear weapons.The disadvantage is that chemical weapons contribute to the pollution of air, waters and soils. Also the use is sometimes dependent on the atmospheric conditions.
Some biological alternatives to the use of chemical pesticides is to use biological control agents like fungi, bacteria, or viruses.
Very probable Al-Qaeda don't use chemical weapons.
No country uses biological weapons of any type at this time.
By treaty, during the 20th century, chemical/biological weapons were banned (Restricted); During the Vietnam War, the US reserved the right of "First Strike" with nuclear weapons; the US reserved the right to retaliate with chemical weapons; the US would NOT use biological weapons. Other than Agent Orange, and some other possible experimental chemicals; CS gas was the most common chemical weapon used. And there was even raised eyebrows when GI's used that ordnance. The biggest problem facing US Forces in Vietnam, was we didn't want the communists to "Up the Ante." If we used CS gas, then they might say, "well it wasn't really CS, it was some other illegal chemical weapon, so we're gonna use ...this on you...". And the Soviets (Russians) had plenty of chemical weapons to distribute to their North Vietnamese ally.