No. There is no single user interface for Linux. GNOME. KDE, Xfce, Fluxbox, and CDE are all examples of user interfaces / desktop environments for Linux.
There are two types of interface.. 1. User Interface 2. Application Interface
By configuring the bootloader to use Windows as the default menu option instead of Linux. Refer to documentation on how to do this.
Most Linux distributions do not use graphical installers for each individual program, so there is no equivalent in Linux. Programs are downloaded and installed through a single interface, be it Synaptic, YaST, apt, and so on.
No. Use samba to interface to the Windows network.
The differences between Linux and Windows hosting boil down to four main things:Price (Linux hosting is almost always cheaper)User interface (Windows servers typically use a GUI, while Linux servers use a command user interface (CUI)Program compatibility (some programs, particularly game server software, will only work on one or the other)Performance (Windows or Linux may perform differently in different tasks)In general, Linux is more popular among experienced users because it is cheaper and often provides a performance advantage. Windows is more popular among people new to servers because it has a more familiar interface.
The 2 operating systems are different from each other. Linux programs aren't meant to work in Windows most of the time. If you want to run Linux programs in Windows, install cygwin, and compile them from source code.
You can make it the default option in the bootloader. Or you could reinstall the Windows bootloader, but it will not allow you to boot Linux without modification.
False. All of the current generation of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, Mac OS, Menuet OS, Haiku OS, Chrome OS, and many others all use a graphical user interface as their primary or only interface for the user to interact with. Linux can be configured to use a command line interface, but it is not the default for most any full-sized installation of Linux (e.g. any version of Linux that is installable, including many live CD/DVD setups, that are larger than approximately 100MB in size).
In a workspace, there are program windows. Consider whole GUI of MS Windows to be a single workspace.
by default Linux doesnt support windows applications although wine and crossover can install and run them. you can take a look at winehq.org and www.codeweavers.com for more information on it and whether your application is supported.
When debating Linux versus Windows, it has been debated that Linux is an out outdated system and is not user friendly. Conversely Windows conversely has had the label of slowing down the entire system and is intended simply for single user.
There are many differences between Windows NT and Linux. Skipping over the obvious ones ( Windows NT is made by Microsoft, Linux has a higher server market share, etc...), probably the most interesting difference is how security is structured. Linux's basic security / permissions structure is modeled after that of older Unices. Different users are assigned different privileges, and a single "root" user can do anything. Windows NT has no "root" user, and no single account has absolute power. In theory, this makes NT more secure, since more accounts would have to be compromised to gain control of the system. In practice, a single "Administrator" account is all that is usually needed to hijack an NT system, and many Linux distributions disable the root account by default.