true A+ users that's all I know
The authorized signatory or signatories of the bank account. If it is a personal bank account this would normally be the owner of the account. For a company, it would be any authorised person, whose specimen signature the bank holds. Sometimes, cheques require more than 1 signature.
Yes. It is required because the bank would require proof over the fact that only the concerned party on whose name the check was issued is the person who is cashing the check. Your signature would be used to validate and confirm the same.
In most cases, no. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
Not unless he is on the account and it is part of the agreement with the bank, and even in that case, the bank would issue an additional card for him and any other authorized users. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
In most cases, no. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
A signature card
The person authorized to write checks on an account is called the account holder or account operating customer. He/she is the only person authorized to write checks on that account. Nobody else can do so. (In case of a joint account, all holders of the account can write checks)
you can go to a famous person and get their autograph, or buy an authorized autograph from a store.
The authorized signatory or signatories of the bank account. If it is a personal bank account this would normally be the owner of the account. For a company, it would be any authorised person, whose specimen signature the bank holds. Sometimes, cheques require more than 1 signature.
Yes. It is required because the bank would require proof over the fact that only the concerned party on whose name the check was issued is the person who is cashing the check. Your signature would be used to validate and confirm the same.
All checks require a payee. Payee is the person who is going to use the check and get the money. You cannot issue a check that does not have a payee.
As long as you were authorized to write checks, no, the other person has no case to press charges against you.
To be an authorized person is to have authority to do something. The train's engineer is the only person authorized to blow the train's whistle.
For people: Only if you have legal power of attorney for that person. For businesses: Only if you are officialy authorized by your company to sign on said persons behalf.
In most cases, no. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
Not unless he is on the account and it is part of the agreement with the bank, and even in that case, the bank would issue an additional card for him and any other authorized users. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
In most cases, no. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.