A photograph that is published in a public record are free to use without restriction unless they are illegal for another reason.
Yes, it is possible to copyright a voice in certain circumstances, such as for recordings of performances or unique vocal performances. However, copyright protection may not extend to the natural sound of a person's voice.
"Where the Red Fern Grows" by Wilson Rawls was first published in 1961. As such, the copyright for the book would extend for 95 years, meaning it would be under copyright until 2056 unless the copyright is renewed.
No, you cannot copyright the word "dictionary" itself as it is a common term. Copyright protection does not extend to single words or short phrases. However, you can potentially copyright the content, arrangement, and design of a specific dictionary as an original work of authorship.
When copyright term was 28 years, renewal allowed the rightsholder to extend his or her exclusive rights to the work. Currently, renewal is neither necessary nor possible in most countries.
Yes, it is possible to copyright an algorithm as long as it meets the requirements for copyright protection, such as being an original work of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression. However, copyright protection may not extend to the underlying idea or functionality of the algorithm itself. It is recommended to consult with a legal expert for specific guidance on copyrighting algorithms.
No, chord progressions are not copyrighted. Copyright protection does not extend to basic musical elements like chord progressions.
Copyright does not protect names, titles, common words/phrases, facts, ideas, discoveries, systems, or methods of operation.It may protect the way these things are expressed (graphics, video, audio, etc) provided they meet the necessary criteria for copyright registration.
In terms of seizure Yes otherwise No
You can copyright "new material." So in the case of a newly-illustrated old book, or an old poem set to new music, or a photograph of an old painting, the protection would not extend to the portion of the work that was in the public domain.
Copyright protections are required to be "for a limited time," but for many years, rightsholders were allowed to renew the copyright, that is to extend protection for a certain amount of time (typically 28 years in the US). Copyright renewal is not available on more recent materials (since 1978).
I'm no expert on this but as I understand it Frost's family has maintained all his poems under copyright since his death. Because of the continual extension of copyright by Congress their copyright will expire in 2038 assuming Congress doesn't extend again.
In the public domain and expiration in 2034 are the respective copyright information regarding the book and film versions of "The Wizard of Oz."Specifically, the copyright ran out on the original 1900 book edition of "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" in 1956. It had benefited from the original 28 years of coverage and an equal amount in extension due to the 1909 Copyright Act. In contrast, the beloved 1939 film version benefits from copyright overhaul that extend protection all the way to December 31, 2034.