Yes, it is better of a company to act selflessly, but it is not a must, if the boss is a bad guy, he might not make his company totally selfless.
A company does not necessarily have to act selflessly to be considered socially responsible. Social responsibility can encompass a range of actions that balance profit-making with ethical considerations, such as sustainable practices, fair labor conditions, and community engagement. Companies can engage in socially responsible behavior while still pursuing their financial interests, as long as they consider the broader impact of their operations on society and the environment. Ultimately, it's about finding a balance between profit and purpose.
No, a corporation does not have to act selflessly to be considered socially responsible. Social responsibility can include balancing profit motives with ethical practices, community engagement, and environmental stewardship. Companies can pursue their financial interests while also making positive contributions to society, as long as they consider the broader impact of their actions. Ultimately, socially responsible behavior can coexist with business objectives, leading to long-term benefits for both the company and the community.
U can say " I love choco selflessly"
This site is for asking questions. "Love other people selflessly" is a statement, not a question.
people who give selflessly
joint stock company act
Altruism is the act of selflessly helping others without expecting anything in return, while selflessness is the quality of putting others' needs before your own without seeking personal gain.
The banking regulation act is the business permit for a banking company.
The provision of the company act in audit requires that all the companies be audited after a given duration of time.
A company can not commit a crime, the managers can.
East India Company
yes...corporate Infocom is a legal company...it is registered by the company act..