It depends on the testing, the animal, the protocol and the zoo. Some tests do hurt the animal (like drawing blood once a week to determine a baseline biochemical profile) but other tests do not (such as presenting a memory test with a food reward to an elephant). Overall, zoos are committed to improving the welfare and health of the animals in their care and zoos are a major source of contributions to information and conservation efforts in the wild.
There is animal testing that inevitably results in pain to the animal; this is minimized and eliminated where possible.
so the animal doesn't harm anyone
it's your opion if they do or don't
yes because in zoos they protect animals
Both, they harm them by taking them out of their natural habitat, but protect them from predators.
Yes, it is illegal and unethical to give drugs to animals in zoos unless prescribed by a qualified veterinarian for medical treatment. Administering drugs without proper authorization can harm the animals and potentially violate animal welfare laws.
animals can not be hunted
yes
Zoos ruin animal life. Animals should be free. Now, domestic animals wouldn't survive out in the wild.
Zoos play a vital role in animal conservation. Zoos are not only a place to educate people about animals and what they needs, zoos also typically have breeding programs. They do their best to breed new generations of rare and endangered animals.
Depends how you look at it. Some zoos are to protect and to prevent endangered animales being extinct, other zoos are just for the publics entertainment. But in a way both are sheltering animals from harm/predators, so I guess the answer would be yes.
Yes because keeping zoos is important for animals to avoid extinction. Zoos help preserve species. Sometimes, zoos keep animals and then release them into the wild when the animal is mature enough. Zoos help save animals' lives. If they are disabled, people can help them.
yes if they did not the animal would die of starvation