Sort of, if your agnostic you aren't really sure if therwe is a god.
But if you believe in a higher power (doesn't have to be a god from a religion) then you are no longer agnostic
1- What universal conflict lies behind his war with the Danes?
a conflict that occurs throughly all around and can have multiple sides
the main conflict is getting there squirrel friend conker into safety and to persuade David into believing in dragons.
Yes, Oedipus' conflict is universal in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, Theban King Oedipus faces conflict when he hears his prophesied fate as his father's killer and his mother's husband. He has to resolve the conflict of whether to accept, avoid or react against an intolerable situation. It is a universal experience to be thrown into situations in which humans have to work things out with little experience, resources or time.
No one founder of agnosticism has existed. The word is a variant of agnosis, which simply means "not knowing," and people use it in reference to their belief that a person cannot truly know whether or not a god does or does not, or gods do or do not, exist. That is strong agnosticism. Weak agnosticism is an individual's being undecided.If it can be said that there was a main proponent of agnosticism, then that proponent was one of Charles Darwin's staunchest defenders, Thomas Henry Huxley. He noted that others had too-strong beliefs--he called them gnostics--whilst he was still searching. For him, agnosticism was an epistemological method, one that might have been equated with rationalism, and thus did not conflict with his being an atheist in metaphysics.Hence, it is possible for a person to be both a strong agnostic and an atheist. Rationalists declare their argumentation defensible and maintain that agnosticism applies. But some of these consider strong agnosticism wrong in that the arguments against God and the arguments for naturalism succeed. It is therefore a matter of judgment. Graham Robert Oppy, in Arguing About Gods,expresses the fallibilist attitude and explains weak agnosticism.
On June 22, 1633, after an inquisition, Galileo Galilei was convicted of the crime of believing something in conflict with God's truth and knowledge. Specifically, for believing the Earth revolves around the Sun.
by believing that knowledge was essential in combating prejudice and achieving tolerance and justice
Yes, Montresor resolves his conflict with Fortunato by luring him into the catacombs and exacting his revenge by walling him up alive. This act of vengeance resolves the conflict between the two characters, with Montresor believing that he has successfully avenged the wrong that Fortunato had done to him.
The Jaguar showed signs of internal conflict as it struggled to reconcile its predatory nature with the intelligence and determination displayed by Leiningen. This conflict was seen in its hesitation and confusion when faced with Leiningen's unexpected defenses.
Conflict might affect the UK public services by using undercover operations, tighetning border control, and sharing terrorism intelligence with other countries.
Herbert O. Yardley has written: 'The Chinese black chamber' -- subject(s): Intelligence service, Military intelligence, Sino-Japanese Conflict, 1937-1945, History
Yes. If we could convince the entire world to believe in one religion there would be a lot less religious conflict. The problem is that this would be nearly impossible. No matter what there would be a group of people who don't accept this "Universal religion". There would also always be a group of people who are no religion and there would be conflict between them and religious people.