Yes It does, the foreskin is there to among other things protect the glans penis from drying out and Karitinisation (thickening and becoming insensitive) The foreskin itself also has between 20 and 100 thousand touch sensitive erogenous nerves that also make sexual intercourse more pleasurable. ad to this the structure of the foreskin and its ability to act as a lubricating sleeve during sex and masturbation which also makes the experience better for the woman and you could reasonably say that circumcision is damaging to the pleasure felt in sexual activity.
The crux of this question is: does amputation of sexually sensitive tissue reduce sexual sensation? Obviously it does, in proportion to the amount of tissue removed, even though circumcisers are now frantically trying to prove otherwise. A related issue concerns so-called complications of (neonatal, i.e. forced) circumcision. Using the statistics given by circumcisers, there must be tens of thousands of men in the world whose circumcisions could only be described as genital mutilation. For these men, clearly circumcision damages their sexual pleasure.
Sexual pleasure is the positive physical feelings one feels when doing sexual acts.
In male circumcision the foreskin is cut off. Some practitioners also make a point to cut off the frenulum, the very sensitive small band of skin that connects the bottom of the glans to the skin of the penis. Circumcision dramatically reduces the sensitivity of the penis and reduces pleasure during sex. The foreskin also slides up and down the penis allowing the male to masturbate. Removal of the foreskin makes it difficult for the male to masturbate. Male circumicision was introduced into the United Kingdom and the United States in the 19th century as an effort to keep boys from being able to masturbate easily. In female circumcision, the labia minora and the clitoris are usually cut off. As with male circumcision, the procedure removes the parts of the genitals that can provide pleasure during sexual activity and masturbation. In many cultures, the objective of female circumcision is to make sure that the victim is unable to have orgasms or experience sexual pleasure.
No it is not. The foreskin both protect the sensitive glans of the penis throughout the males life and plays an important part in sexual response and pleasure in both masturbation and sexual intercourse. no good reason can be shown for circumcision. and it originated as a religious and cultural procedure. any medical reasoning behind it has long since been discredited.
There are no advantages in the removal of the protection and the sexual pleasure that is available from the removal of the foreskin. Circumcision is a religious an cultural rite and there are in fact no health benefits to be had from it. Even Authority's in the US state this position but are cagey in their wording as there is still a thriving industry in both the medical profession and the market for foreskins.
Yes it usually is as the victims of circumcision are usually infants or prepubescent children.
Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that plays a key role in sexual arousal and pleasure. It is released in the brain in response to sexual stimuli, leading to feelings of pleasure and reward. Dopamine helps to increase sexual desire and motivation, as well as enhance the overall experience of sexual pleasure.
Yes for example if a foreskin is too long it can be trimmed back. keep in mind however that the foreskin is a very enervated part of the penis and all of it plays an important part in sexual performance and pleasure
There is no reason other then cultural pressure to have this done to women. Female genital mutilation is designed to take away the pleasure of sex from women and in other cases to also prevent sexual intercourse.
Partial circumcision removes only part of the foreskin. Partial foreskin may be used to treat phimosis (a tight foreskin) that does not respond to gradual stretching exercises with a corticosteroid cream. Instead of removing the entire foreskin, partial circumcision only removes the tight phimotic ring that prevents the foreskin from being retracted. Many men with phimosis prefer partial circumcision to complete circumcision as it retains most of the foreskin, which functions in several ways to increase pleasure during sexual activity.
Because circumcision reduces sexual pleasure, disfigures the penis and is assaulting a child, forcing them to be associated with a religion they may not choose.Jewish AnswerOnly a very small percentage of Jews are choosing to not circumcise their sons. Their reasoning for this follows the same reasoning espoused by the anti-abortion movement.
No.