No, carbon dioxide is harmless to the ozone layer. There are a couple of competing indirect effects, though: at the lower boundary of the ozone layer, carbon dioxide does slow down the production of new ozone. However, higher in the atmosphere, it helps keep existing ozone from breaking down; overall, there's some evidence that elevated carbon dioxide has actually sped up the recovery of the ozone layer from depletion caused by CFCs.
This is actually a debated topic, and research is ongoing, so it's possible that new evidence will be found that tips the balance definitively one way or the other on the "it's good for the ozone/it's bad for the ozone" scale.
CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) destroy ozone in the ozone layer.
Yes, CFCs can destroy the ozone layer. They react with ozone present in ozone layer and decompose it.
You don't destroy ozone layer. It is vital for life on earth.
Yes.CFC's destroy the ozone layer.
No, it does not destroy. The ozone layer is present in stratosphere. No meteor shower can destroy it.
The chemicals that destroy the ozone layer are CFC's. These CFC's are cholorofluorocarbons which react with ozone to destroy it.
the ozone layer but because of CO2 the are some gapes in it that can effect the earth and destroy the planet
No. There is negligible elemental carbon in our atmosphere. On Mars, CO2 is converted to CO, and ozone is formed. This mechanism is expected to be much weaker at Earth's higher air pressures. But CO2 presents no *chemical* challenge to ozone.
CFC's destroy ozone. They react with ozone and deplete it.
HCFC do not destroy ozone. They are an alternative to CFC's.
The ozone layer can be destroyed by CFC's. They react with ozone.
The gases that destroy ozone are CFC's. They react with ozone to deplete it.