It surely will when the US adds a state. Right now with 435 Representatives it is already unmanageable.
njk"How does the 27 th amendment make Congress more representative of the peopledoes the 27 th amendment make Congress more representative of the peopleHow does the 27 th amendment make Congress more representative of the people
The American people, or more exactly the American people who vote.
The ratification wasn’t decided by the “people “ but by congress.
The constitution is a piece of paper. Everything on that paper is subject to change if Congress chooses to, and the people choose Congress. So I would have to say the people.
They wanted the people to have a role in selecting the president. Giving the vote solely to Congress takes it much more out of the hands of the people.
they were all presidents that did important things and i think people on the congress voted or they payed people to put them on the money wich ever way was easier at the time
Yes.. but then congress gave it to Illinois so they could have more access to the great lakes.
They wanted the people to have a role in selecting the president. Giving the vote solely to Congress takes it much more out of the hands of the people.
representation in the House of Representatives is based upon official population census counts
because the number of representatives that a state would have both houses of congress would be based on that state's population. states with more people would have more votes in congress. this plan would have more favor the large States,
NO 2nd Answer: There should be more people in Congress who are dedicated to serving the American people and not lining their own pockets, whether they are men or women.
Indian People's Congress was created in 1993.