Want this question answered?
An inference is a logical conclusion based on observations. A generalization is a logical conclusion based on many observations and data. The difference between the two is that inferences deal with specifics pertaining to the experiment being worked on, while generalizations are more "general" and apply more to the idea than the specific experiment.
specifics, facts, and evidence
A guardian account is a court appointed fiduciary who is instructed by the court to handle the affairs and financial matters of a of a person who is legally disabled (physically/mentally/or even limited by age) with the guardian. State law varies on the specifics of guardianships, but many are consistent from state to state.
They are called groundwater. Far as I know, there is no specific name separating ground water in shallow water table and the ground water in confined aquifer. So you might have to called by the full description "groundwater in confined aquifer layer". Aquifer is the specifics name for porous rock and earth media in the question.
Confounding variables are variables that aren't accounted for that may affect the outcome of an experiment. For example, they are things you don't expect to be affecting something. Say we are doing any experiment, and we have set it up to test variables X and Y. However, at the end of the experiment, we find that another variable (variable Z) was part of the experiment but we didn't plan on it being there in the first place. Basically, you need to set it up so that no other variables outside of the ones you want to take place are in the experiment.
Deductive reasoning
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
APEX: with specifics rather than generalizations.
APEX: with specifics rather than generalizations.
with specifics rather than generalizations.
Type your answer here... with specifics rather than generalizations.
deductive arguemeny
Inductive logic, or inductive reasoning is any form of argument where the premises mean that the conclusion is probably correct . for example: "that ring cost me only 3 dollars. Rings that are made of gold almost always cost more than 3 dollars. Therefore that ring is not made of gold" That argument was inductive because while it is almost certainly right, it is theoretically possible that the ring is actually made of gold but was just sold for 3 dollars for some reason. Inductive logic is diffrent from deductive logic because in deductive logic if the premises are true and the conclusion logically follows the premises then there is no possible way that the conclusion could be false.
Well Blah blah blah who cares about this rubish. Its pathetic :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
An inference is a logical conclusion based on observations. A generalization is a logical conclusion based on many observations and data. The difference between the two is that inferences deal with specifics pertaining to the experiment being worked on, while generalizations are more "general" and apply more to the idea than the specific experiment.
Henri Johmini's last publication on warfare was titled Summary of the Art of War. In this last publication, Johmini reversed his usual point of view. In this publication, Johmini spoke only in generalizations, not on specifics. Historians claim he did this as he assumed all readers were already familiar with his earlier works.
100-1000 depending on specifics