answersLogoWhite

0

Does fact required for a theory?

User Avatar

Anonymous

16y ago
Updated: 8/17/2019

Theories tend to Remain a Pseudo Fact, until proven otherwise, the theorist, is under no obligation to Prove his Theory, which makes anyone capable of writing a Theory, without using any Facts whatsoever. Of course it's always advisable to throw a few facts around within the Theory, to add some Credibility to your Theory. Remember if you could prove a theory as Fact, then it would no longer be a Theory, but a Fact.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is required for a theory to be scientific?

Scientific observations and experimental results are required for a theory to be scientific.


What is -in theory not in fact?

A "theory" is a scenario of what might be.


What is the difference between a clue and a theory?

A clue is a datum - a fact. A "theory" tries to tell you what the fact means.


What does having a solid background at math have to do with physics chemistry computer science and engineering?

The fact that it's required to even begin to understand fundamental theory in all of them?


What is the theory that genes are located on your chromosomes?

It is not a theory, it is a provable fact.


How is a theory different than a fact?

theory can only be a best simulation based on a formula. Fact is material proof


What are the difference between a theory and a scientific theory?

law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea


What is the difference in fact and theory?

well its a fact that turtles do in fact kill people, and its theory that they are nice creatures. when in fact, turtles are mean and kill lil boys, and guinea pigs kill turtles, its a theory that they are at war with each other..........and that's the reason people die.


What is the name for a proven theory?

Fact


What is significant theory?

A significant theory is one that can be supported by relevant material, in which the theory you are proposing is in fact a possibility.


How can you prove that this theory is correct?

In science, a theory is, by definition, proven and accepted as fact.


Why does it make more energy to stop a moving ball than the energy required to keep it moving?

The natural tendency of a moving object is to keep moving. And it doesn't really require energy to stop it; in fact, in theory, you can gain energy from it. What is required is a force.