Perhaps not change them but give a better understanding of them and most other subjects too.
Klaus Landfried has written: 'Stefan George' -- subject(s): Political and social views 'Steps towards a European higher education area without borders' -- subject(s): Hochschulrektorenkonferenz, Higher Education
The Age of Enlightenment, which was during the 18th century when science started to change people's views and what they believed in.
She is a devoted christian. Therefore, she supports religion.
ytuigt7yihug7ifyytfd6ufof8fg7ufg7uyguhfuyff6756t68llyfkityyktfg
Higher education often draws sharply divided views. Some esteem it as a mile marker in life while others consider it an elitist institution.
people of rajastan are mostly hindus, so they have Hindu views or religion
The benefits of having Religion in education is there can be more subjective and fanciful interpretations of facts so as to not erode the religious torpor that tends to reside in religious institutions. The benefits of NOT having Religion in education is the subjects are thoroughly taught, with no skewing or slanting to fit the religious point of views. Religion is fine, for religious use. But education should NEVER be confused with religious creationism and ID. Religious creationism and ID are simply backwards made up 'explaination' for how religious people try to 'prove' thier religion. Religion is based upon faith, not science. There is no proof of faith, except for the feelings inside. Science needs NO outside proof to validate it.
G o d !,
Her religious views are not known.
He thought everyone needed education
Which religion? There are different religions, which have different views of God (or gods).
He contributed views on religion and women.