0
What else can I help you with?
Did rome have a Supreme Court?
Ancient Rome did not have a Supreme Court in the modern sense. However, it had a complex legal system with various courts and magistrates overseeing different types of cases. The highest judicial authority was the Senate, which could influence legal decisions, and the Emperor often held ultimate judicial power. Legal decisions were also guided by the Twelve Tables and later legal codes, but there was no singular court akin to a Supreme Court as we understand it today.
How did congress organize the judicial branch?
Congress organized the judicial branch through the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the federal court system. This act created a Supreme Court, along with lower federal courts, including district and circuit courts, outlining their jurisdiction and structure. Additionally, it defined the roles of the Supreme Court justices and allowed Congress to determine the number of justices on the Supreme Court. This framework laid the foundation for the U.S. judicial system as it exists today.
What was Chief Justice Marshalls decision in the case of Marbury v. Madison?
Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.
What chief justice marshall decision in the case of marbury v. Madison?
Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.
What was Chief Justice Marshall's decision in case of Marbury v Madison?
Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.
What was the long term importance of the supreme courts decision in marbury v Madison?
The Court decided that Marbury's request for a writ of mandamus was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court held to be unconstitutional. The Court decided unanimously (4-0) that the federal law contradicted the Constitution, and since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, it must reign supreme. Through this case, Chief Justice John Marshall established the power of judicial review: the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.This case is the Court's first elaborate statement of its power of judicial review. In language which remains relevant today, Chief Justice Marshall said, "lt is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." Nowhere in the Constitution does the Court have the power that Chief Justice Marshall proclaimed. Despite there being no mention of such power in the Constitution, since 1803, our Nation has assumed the two chief principles of this case: that when there is a conflict between the Constitution and a federal or state law, the Constitution is supreme; and that it is the job of the Court to interpret the laws of the United States.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
What best describes the ideological distribution of the Supreme Court today?
The ideological distribution of the Supreme Court today skews slightly conservative.
What was the long-term importance of the supreme court's decision in Marbury v. Madison?
The Court decided that Marbury's request for a writ of mandamus was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court held to be unconstitutional. The Court decided unanimously (4-0) that the federal law contradicted the Constitution, and since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, it must reign supreme. Through this case, Chief Justice John Marshall established the power of judicial review: the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.This case is the Court's first elaborate statement of its power of judicial review. In language which remains relevant today, Chief Justice Marshall said, "lt is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." Nowhere in the Constitution does the Court have the power that Chief Justice Marshall proclaimed. Despite there being no mention of such power in the Constitution, since 1803, our Nation has assumed the two chief principles of this case: that when there is a conflict between the Constitution and a federal or state law, the Constitution is supreme; and that it is the job of the Court to interpret the laws of the United States.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
How did the US government finally settle on the 9 justice system they have today?
The Constitution gives the power of deciding the number of Supreme Court justices to Congress. In 1789, Congress called for the six appointed justices. As the nation grew in area and more judicial circuits were added, Congress adjusted the number of Supreme Court justices. In 1807, Congress adjusted the number to seven; in in 1837, nine; in 1863, ten; and in 1869, back to nine Supreme Court justices.
What was the long-term significance of the decision of Marbury v. Madison for the US government?
The Court decided that Marbury's request for a writ of mandamus was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court held to be unconstitutional. The Court decided unanimously (4-0) that the federal law contradicted the Constitution, and since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, it must reign supreme. Through this case, Chief Justice John Marshall established the power of judicial review: the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.This case is the Court's first elaborate statement of its power of judicial review. In language which remains relevant today, Chief Justice Marshall said, "lt is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." Nowhere in the Constitution does the Court have the power that Chief Justice Marshall proclaimed. Despite there being no mention of such power in the Constitution, since 1803, our Nation has assumed the two chief principles of this case: that when there is a conflict between the Constitution and a federal or state law, the Constitution is supreme; and that it is the job of the Court to interpret the laws of the United States.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
What is the name of the Supreme Court Justice who initially gave the Supreme Court prestige that it has today?
My Penis. His full name was Harry P. Ickle
How does power check power in today's is government?
Today's government is made up of three branches-- the Legislative (Congress), Executive (President), and Judicial (Courts). Each of these branches holds different checks over the other branches. There are actually several checks that each branch holds, but here are a few examples: The President can veto a bill passed by Congress. This is a check that the Executive Branch holds over the Legislative. The US Supreme Court can declare an act passed by Congress unconstitutional. This is an example of a check the Judicial Branch holds over the Legislative. The President nominates federal judges for the Supreme Court and also for the other federal courts. Then, the Senate has to approve these nominees. This is actually an example of a couple of checks. The first is one that both the Executive and Legislative hold over the Judicial-- since they both have a say in who becomes a judge, they both check the judges in the US Supreme Court and in other federal courts. The second is one held by the Legislative over the Executive. This is that they must approve all nominees.
