answersLogoWhite

0

Does medical testing do more harm than good?

Updated: 8/17/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Best Answer

yes, in many cases of animal testing animals die and or get very sick during the testing process.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does medical testing do more harm than good?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Does Medical Testing on animals do more harm than good?

It is harm people just shove needles in them and it can kill them!


Which claim is the narrowest and most focused?

Because of advances in medical care airline pilot should be allowed to work be on the age of 60


Did imperialism do more harm than good in Africa?

Yes, imperialism did do more harm than good in Afria.


Did Reconstruction do more harm or more good?

Reconstruction is more good.


Does a free press do more harm than good?

harm


Has ICT done more harm?

debate ( I.C.T. has caused more harm than good. speak for the motion)


Medical testing on animals are more good?

It usually does more harm than good. Not only is the process torturous and deadly for the animals involved (i.e. open heart surgery performed on dogs without anesthesia, brain fluid extracted from cats, burns inflicted on rabbits, dyes and chemicals injected into the eyes of animals etc) but it also does little to further the medical community. Many tests are repeated numerous times by different companies because their is no reporting database so tests often get duplicated a multitude of times. Furthermore, companies are legally allowed to do the test over and over until they get the desired result. So, say if a company is testing the safety of a chemical in a household cleaner and 50% of the rabbits die, they can keep running the same test (or dilute the amount of the chemical) until they get the legal amount of deaths so they can put the product on the market. It is not protecting us, just getting them past legal hurdles at the expense of animal lives. Moreover, we now have things like artificial skin which makes it unnecessary to perform these tests on living subjects. I hope that answers your question!


Did extreme abolitionists do mor harm than good?

let me guess. Levi?? They did more harm than good, sweetheart.


Does fashion do more harm than good?

Yes


Does ict do more good than harm?

yes


Do fast food restaurants do more harm then good?

my it would seem that fast food does do more harm than good. because it could cause some deises


Has ICT done more harm than good?

yes i .c.t has than more than good