True
up my
Well if the GRASSLANDS were destroyed all the animals in the grasslands would die of course. And we would also lose a very big part of our environment.
it depends on if the primary succession succeeds and is basically depending on whether anything that happens that could make it be in a state that it would for example burn down that would make it happen
A climax community would form
There is no chance of life then. Troposphere containing ozone will be destroyed too.
up my
fyjfuyffufjgiugxyfht
Secondary Succession refers to the reintroduction of a community to an area that has previously supported life. Reintroduction may have to happen because a wild fire, flood or earthquake has completely destroyed life in this ecosystem. Secondary succession reaches a climax community quicker than in primary succession because spores and seeds of plants may remain in the soil. Whereas in primary succession this would all take time to come about. Just remember any type of succession starts with increasing the biomass of vegetation so that more life can be supported and more food chains evolved.
Well if the GRASSLANDS were destroyed all the animals in the grasslands would die of course. And we would also lose a very big part of our environment.
War of the Polish Succession happened in 1733.
War of the Portuguese Succession happened in 1580.
War of the Jülich succession happened in 1609.
War of Succession of Champagne happened in 1216.
War of the Euboeote Succession happened in 1256.
War of the Limburg Succession happened in 1283.
Landshut War of Succession happened in 1503.
War of the Castilian Succession happened in 1475.