no
No. That would violate the Newtonian principle of Conservation of Mass.
No, this does not violate the conservation of momentum principle. As the ball is thrown up, its vertical velocity decreases, causing a decrease in momentum in that direction. However, the overall momentum of the ball (including horizontal and vertical components) remains constant in the absence of external forces. When the ball reaches its highest point and falls back down, its vertical velocity increases again, conserving the total momentum of the system.
no Nothing violates that law.
The principle that utter morons cannot take office
no Nothing violates that law.
no it does not violate the law of conservation of energy as energy is not lost/destroyed but transferred to the brakes of the truck.
No, it does not violate the law of conservation of energy. When a particle falls, its potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. The total energy (potential + kinetic) remains constant, demonstrating the conservation of energy.
It is the idea of a machine continuously producing energy, without energy input - or producing more energy than what is put into the machine. This would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics (conservation of energy), and in general, it is not believed to be possible. No process is known which violates the conservation of energy. (A "perpetual motion machine of the second kind" would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics; this is generally believed to be impossible, too.)
No, fusion does not violate the law of conservation of matter. In fusion reactions, the total mass of the reactants is equal to the total mass of the products, as mass is converted into energy according to Einstein's famous equation, Emc2.
No, nothing can violate the law of conservation of energy, it's a law! Energy can convert to mass, and mass can convert to energy, but the overall total of mass and energy in the universe is constant.
I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.
Perpetual motion would only fit the principle of the conservation of energy if it was a machine that moved that did not have any friction or produce any sound or produce any form of heat or energy that could be lost in any way. Since no such machine is possible to create, as far as we know, perpetual motion is declared an impossibility and does NOT fit the principle of the conservation of energy. Energy will undoubtedly be lost somewhere in a moving system.