No it doesn't have a 9 inch rear... All though I really wish it did... It is a 8.8 inch ring gear and it is also an integral differential. Meaning that the only way to access the gears is to remove the rear cover. The 9 inch Ford rear was a bullet proof rear end. It has what they call a removable carrier and also you can just remove the pinion gear by itself. What made these rears so great was on the end of the pinion gear was a snout that slipped into a roller cage type bearing, so when under heavy excelaration the ring gear won't bend the pinion gear and break off destroying the whole rear end... This was a problem on all GM cars with a 10 bolt rears. The 12 bolt rears were a bit stronger but a lot of guys who drag raced their GM cars would put 9 inch Ford rears in them. Then a company called "Strange" bought the patten rights from Ford so they started using their 8.8 rears... I had to rebuild mine in my 89 Mark VII twice now and the 2nd time I put a 3.73 gear set in it and replaced the 3.27. If it was a 9 inch I'd still be driving it without ever taking it apart, only changing the gear oil in it every 25,000 to 50,000 depending on how much I was towing my camper... I've been using Mobil 1 Synthetic 75/140w since I bought.
yes it will
not today.
Nope
Nope sorry it doesn't have a 9" rear... It's an 8.8 integral rear where the 9" has a removable carrier aka: pumpkin... I only wish my 1989 Mark VII had a 9" because it was an still is a bullet proof rear!!! I had to rebuild mine once and it is in need of another rebuild. I wish I had the money to fabricate a 9" into my Lincoln I would have done this a long time ago... They do have housings for the Mustangs of this era but the Lincoln is wider and a little different then the Mustang...
NHL player Mark Fistric was born on 06-01-86 and as of the end of the 2013-2014 season is 28 years old.
Depends most likely a 256 or a 272 I have seen both if its two wheel drive.
i think the normal rear end already has two wheel drive because my '86 chev S10 has 2wd already built in unless Posi-tract is more different but i think there not much of a difference just tryin to save you money
There are 2.54 centimetres in one inch. Therefore, rounded to two decimal places, 86 centimetres is equal to 86/2.54 = 33.86 inches.
You don't. It uses a small amount of transmission grease similar to the grease in the rear end.
I ASSUME axle code " 86 " is the same as it is on the ( 1996 ) Ford Ranger ( 3.73 gear ratio , conventional / non - limited slip )
go to a junk yard and get the whole 8.8 inch rear end from a 86-93 lincoln. there are plenty Ford/Lincoln were not equipped with Posi-Traction. That term is used by the GM world. If your Mark VII was not equipped with Trac-Loc, you can search the junk yards and you can identify them by the sticker that is located in the driver door opening. Or you can purchase a trac-loc system from Ford Racing for some cash.
Usually a Dana 35, unless it has the metric ton package. Then it would have the Dana 44.