This question is more of a question of Theology and the study of how God intervenes in human life than a History question.
If you ask did any good come out of the Holocaust, the answer is that the Jews formed a Jewish nation of Israel which was a fulfillment of scriptural prophecy. The Jews were so weak that they went to the gas chambers without questioning or fighting back. The only exceptions were the revolts in the ghettos.
As a result the Jews seemed to realize that they were not accepted anywhere so they had to form their own country and were willing to fight England and the Palestenians to get it.
Did God do that? The reforming of the nation of Israel is considered by theologians as a fulfillment of God's prophecy of the events that will be a sign of the end of times. My personal belief is that this would NOT have happened if it had not been for the persecution of the Jews during WW2.
In my mind the opposite. God does exist. In The Bible it speaks about: The Jewish people, God's chosen would be persecuted and only a remnant would be saved. (Holcaust started circa 1933 with Hitler taking power). Afterwords the country of Israel came to existence again (1948) due to (what I believe) was the holocaust and the sorrow the UN member nations felt on them.
One more Bible prophesy fulfilled.
no.
Amun was a god. You therefore cannot prove either that did exist or that he didn't exist, the same as with modern gods.
No 'divine' sources or divinities have been proven to exist.
The answers simple. God doesn't exist or he just doesn't care anymore. It's inhuman to let children suffer.
At the time of the Holocaust, the nation of Israel did not yet exist.
Are you implying that the disabled didn't exist before the holocaust?
Gods prophets, and God does exist there are any Islamic miracles to prove this.
It is not possible to prove God doesn't exist, just as we can't prove fairies, elves and unicorns don't exist. The inability to prove something doesn't exist does not therefore mean that it does exist. It is not possible to prove that there is no teapot in orbit around Pluto, yet the lack of such a proof doesn't mean that the teapot therefore exists. There have been several attempts to prove that God exists using logic (eg Kalam cosmological argument, Transcendental Argument for God [TAG]), but these are not universally accepted as valid and true - if they were then there'd be no need for any further discussion.
Amun was a god. You therefore cannot prove either that did exist or that he didn't exist, the same as with modern gods.
Some science suggests that a god may exist. However there is still no proof to prove that god does exist. Actually, there's no proof to prove that science exists either, but don't let that bother you. Just take our word for it. Would we get something this important wrong?
no it really does not because every one knows he is real
No 'divine' sources or divinities have been proven to exist.
Yes, Chuck Norris exists. Is it possible to prove this? o.o -- I mean, <atheism>if god doesn't exist, and Chuck Norris is god, then wtf! Does he exist? o.o</atheism>
Blaise Pascal, a French mathematician, philosopher, and theologian, is credited with this idea, known as Pascal's Wager. He argued that it is rational to believe in God, as doing so may lead to eternal rewards, while disbelief carries the risk of eternal punishment.
Trevor Treharne has written: 'How to prove God doesn't exist' -- subject(s): Atheism, God, Proof
Bam Margera's religion is not publicly known, as he has not spoken openly about his religious beliefs.
One viewOn the contrary I can prove he is there, you find him around to motivate you to excel in everything and stand for whatever is right. Another viewGenerally, it is not possible to prove a negative, so no one can absolutely prove that God does not exist, just as no one can prove that Zeua or Brahma does not exist. However, in each case it is possible to prove that it is most unlikely that they exist. The Pascal's Wager should really be to worship all gods, in case one or the other turns out to exist after all.It is a fallacy, in any case, that atheists must prove that God does not exist. Normal practice is that the person who asserts something to exist must do the proving; so Christians must prove that God does exist, but after centuries of trying are still unable to do so. A famous parallel example is that if I assert that orbiting the sun between earth and Mars there is a small, perfectly formed teapot, I must prove its existence: it is not for sceptics to prove its nonexistence.Another viewIt is possible to rule out the existence of gods that have certain attributes beyond a reasonable doubt. The traditional view of God as an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent being can be safely ruled out, as the attributes named are mutually incompatible. If God possesses omniscience, and knows perfectly and entirely all future events, then He is not free to change what has been foreseen and is therefore not omnipotent. If He can change what he has foreseen then there is a flaw in his omniscience. His supposed attribute of omnibenevolence is incompatible with natural and human evil in the world. As for proving a negative see link below.
Since you cannot prove a negative statement, one cannot prove that ghosts do not exist.