They both have glacial land mass. Glacial land mass is essentially ice, so it can grow or shrink based on the climate cycle.
The North Pole, as it is a point on the Arctic ice sheet, that floats on the Arctic Ocean.
The South Pole has a landmass buried below the ice cap.
south pole
The North Pole, as it is an imaginary point on the Arctic Ice Cap, which floats on top of the Arctic Ocean.
north sweetp
No there is no landmass under the North Pole
Definately the North Pole, also I did my research so it is a 100% correct.
The North Pole is located in the Arctic Ocean and is covered by sea ice, so there is no land directly underneath it. In contrast, the South Pole is situated on the continent of Antarctica, which is a landmass covered by ice sheets that are kilometers thick.
Both the North Pole and the South Pole are snowy, with the South Pole generally receiving more snowfall due to its larger landmass and colder temperatures. Snow at the North Pole is primarily sea ice that accumulates over the frozen Arctic Ocean.
The North Pole is located in the Arctic Ocean and is covered by floating sea ice with no land underneath. In contrast, the South Pole is located on the continent of Antarctica, which is a landmass covered by ice sheets.
The North Pole is over the Arctic Ocean. The South Pole is over Antarctica, which is a landmass.
The North Pole does not have any land beneath it, as it is located in the Arctic Ocean and is covered by sea ice. In contrast, the South Pole sits on the continent of Antarctica, which is a landmass covered by ice and snow. Therefore, the South Pole has more land under it compared to the North Pole.
I think it is because its further away from the equator. Not really, The reason the South Pole is colder than the North Pole is because the South Pole sits on a landmass, while the North Pole sits on a Ocean, which keeps the region slightly warmer.
A "Regina" is another word for a "Queen". Your question makes no English sense and therefore can not be answered.