answersLogoWhite

0

No. The plaintiff has the burden of proof.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When is the legal burden of proof on the accused?

Under US law: There is NO burden on the accused defendant to prove anything. The entire burden of proof lies with the prosecution.


What is the highest burden of proof?

The burden of proof is on the prosecutor. They must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty. The defense only needs to raise reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt. If jurors believe the defendant may have committed the crime, but have reasonable doubt then they must find the defendant not guilty.


Res ipsa loquitur means that the burden of proof?

A. shifts to the defendant


In a criminal case, what standard must the burden of proof meet to establish the guilt of the defendant?

In a criminal case, the burden of proof must meet the standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt" to establish the guilt of the defendant.


Can you use burden of proof in a sentence?

The burden of proof was on the district attorney in proving the man was guilty of robbery.


Who has the burden of proof?

"Beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case, "A preponderance of the evidence" in a civil case. The advocate of a case always has the burden of proof - the prosecutor in a criminal case, the plaintiff in a civil case.


The requirement to provide convincing edvidence that the defendant committed the act?

burden of proof


What does the term burden of proof in a criminal case mean?

The term "burden of proof" in a criminal case refers to the obligation of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt. This standard is typically "beyond a reasonable doubt," meaning the evidence presented must leave the jury with a high degree of certainty about the defendant's guilt. The burden of proof remains with the prosecution throughout the trial, and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.


Who has the burden of proof in an insanity defense?

In an insanity defense, the defense must prove that the defendant is insane.


What changed in the practice of Law that shifted the burden of proof of insanity to the defendant?

the Federal Insanity Defense Reform Act


What is the burden of proof in a misdemeanor case?

In a misdemeanor case, the burden of proof is typically "beyond a reasonable doubt." This means that the prosecution must prove that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged to a high degree of certainty.


Who has the burden of proof in an alibi defense?

(in the US) The prosecution ALWAYS bears the burden of proof to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, however, if the defendant uses an alibi defense, REALISTICALLY-speaking, they are going to have to furnish some credible evidence that they WERE incapable of being present at the scene of the offense at the time of its occurrence.