It is true that the national government's power to govern economic affairs stems from the Commerce Clause. The clause is found in Article I of the U.S. Constitution.
The Commerce Clause
The result of Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark Supreme Court decision that established federal power over interstate commerce. The ruling clarified that the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution granted the federal government authority to regulate trade between states, leading to a broad interpretation of federal power in regulating economic activities.
The United States has a free market economic system. Monetary policy and lending to banks are governed by an independent Federal Reserve system. Congress does however have the authority to regulate the economy through the Interstate Commerce clause.
Part II of the act extended federal authority to motor carriers engaged in interstate commerce.
The Federal government in the US has many ways to influence commerce. Passing tariff legislation on certain foreign imports is one way, and of course by lowering the tariff rates of dissolving them, the federal government increases imports.The US federal government has the authority to regulate interstate commerce. Commerce can also be affected by higher or lower taxes on business or on the population.
tennesee valley authority
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)by Kishon Francis (Grenada)
The federal Congress could not establish a common currency, regulate interstate commerce, or levy taxes
The decision in Gibbons v. Ogden addressed the issue of whether states have the authority to regulate interstate commerce or if that power belongs exclusively to the federal government. The ruling established that regulating interstate commerce is a federal power under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Part III gave the federal government authority to regulate common carriers operating in interstate commerce in the coastal, intercoastal, and inland waters of the United States.
Both gave the federal government more power by expanding its authority in individual state's economic activities. McCulloch v Maryland gave the federal bank power over states, and Gibbons v Ogden gave Congress power to regulate interstate commerce.
Yes, Marshall's ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden affirmed that the federal government, not the states, had the authority to regulate interstate commerce, including ferry services. This decision established a precedent for federal regulation of commerce and laid the foundation for the expansion of federal power in regulating the economy.