0
Does the latest scientific evidence tend to point toward or away from God?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
First off it depends which religion but by the question I'm going to assume it is a 'one - God' religion and secondly, and I don't mean to be controversial but the answer is no.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Where does the moon point toward?
It doesnt point anywhere it is constantly rotating. But it is pulled by the earth.
What is a lens that refracts light toward a point and are thicker in middle?
They are convex lenses.
Does Kepler 22B have moons?
It is uncertain at this point. Some evidence suggests that it may have a moon
What direction does the angular velocity vector of the Earth's rotation point toward?
The Earth's angular velocity vector due to its axial rotation points towards the north pole.
What is the difference between solstice and eclipse?
an eclipse is the blocking of the sun by the moon, or the moon by the earth, a solstice is a point of the year when the earth's tilt is most toward or away from the sun
Do you get arthritis pain when the season changes?
There is anecdotal evidence that this happens but there is no real scientific evidence that point at this.
What is the name of the person that collects the evidence from the bones?
If this question refers to evidence from an historical point of view, such as studying dinosaur bones, the answer is palaeontologist.If the question refers to the collection of evidence from a scientific/medical or even criminal point of view, the answer is forensic anthropologist.
Which of the following terms is defined as a point of view based on personal beliefs or preferences rather than on scientific evidence?
bias.
Is there any evidence you can point me to that colon cleansers actually do some good?
There doesn't seem to be any available scientific evidence that colon cleansers do anything for the body. The people who offer such services or products rely on anecdotal evidence.
Enumerate the rule of scientific notation?
Scientific notation must include the numbers one to nine followed by a decimal point. Also, if the decimal is moved toward the left hand side, the number will become larger.
As we see the boundaries of our scientific knowledge expand daily is scientific discovery pointing more toward a Divine Creation of life or away from it?
If it were pointing toward a divine creation, it would also be pointing to the complete irrelevance of faith. This would be a serious if not insurmountable problem for some faith-based systems. What is the need for faith when confronted with concrete evidence? On the other hand, no amount of science however widely expanded it is can ever disprove creation. So there isn't much evidence of a changing pointer. However, the expansion of discovery may be pointing away from the authoritative position of the accepted creation accounts in the scriptures of some faiths. The scientific discoveries themselves point neither toward nor away from divine creation. The interpretations that are placed on the discoveries by most scientists point away from God. For other scientists, the same discoveries either indicate an unspecified supernatural origin to life or specifically point to creation of life by God.
What is the opposite of anecdotes?
There doesn't seem to be an opposite to anecdotes. An anecdote is a "small" story that proves a point (i.e. anecdotal evidence). So the opposite is either a "large" story or evidence that is not anecdotal. Of course, an anecdotal story could be a rather long story and a "yarn" or a "tale" could be a rather short story. Certainly, a tale would be hard pressed to be a tale if it was a real short story. However, there are such things as long-winded anecdotes. Science seems to want to make the distinction clearer. Anecdotes are supposedly "non-scientific", which is rather odd to me. Does that mean that a tale, such as a non-fiction book, is not scientific. I mean it is possible to have a book that is nothing but anecdotes, but proves its point to a greater degree then using some scientific method, no? Not surprisingly, in the legal world "anecdotal" evidence can be very persuasive: more persuasive then scientific methods. Yes, I think when people are just chatting to prove some point and they use some anecdote do prove their point they might want to remind the person listening by saying "well, this is just anecdotal evidence". But usually the point has already been made. That's my non-anecdotal and non-scientific take anyways.
When a theory has been established a it cannot change b it must become law c it may be altered or changed or d it becomes accepted scientific principle?
Once a theory is established, it both becomes accepted scientific principle and may be altered or changed at a later point (normally upon discovery of new evidence or through revaluation of existing evidence).
Latest power point presentation about 3g mobile tech?
The latest itech is the ipad it is a 6 by 12 iphone.
In terms of rhetoric, an argument is?
a collection of evidence assembled to support a point of view
What is the point of using scientific notation?
The point of using scientific notation is to compute very large or very small numbers.
Why is it necessary to place arrowhead of the vector in the terminal point?
Just to signify that that exact point is the final or latest limiting point.
