If something doesn't hold water, it is full of holes. If an argument doesn't hold water, then it's full of logic holes. In other words, it's not holding up as a logical argument.
Karl marx
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels are two of the most famous materialist philosophers known for their contributions to the theory of dialectical materialism.
The main difference between materialist and idealist approaches in anthropology lies in their focus. Materialist approaches emphasize the role of economic and material factors in shaping societies, while idealist approaches prioritize the influence of ideas, beliefs, and culture on human behavior and social structures.
This was established under a materialist conception of history.
Peter Gidal has written: 'Materialist film'
The most appropriate tactic is to try to identify the missing premises by considering what additional information is needed to make the argument logically sound. One approach is to ask questions to uncover the assumptions or missing elements that would strengthen the argument. Additionally, considering alternative perspectives and potential counterarguments can help in determining what unstated premises might be necessary for the argument to hold up.
if the argument has already started then stick up for one of the people and start bitching to the other person. if there's no argument then just start bitching to the person you want to have an argument with
The correct spelling of the word is argument.Some example sentences with this word are:There is an argument next door.The political argument wore on for hours.His argument brought up some valid points.
Brook means to put up with, or tolerate, so the whole thing means it doesn't have to to put up with any argument.
A pseudo-argument lacks a reasonable argument. It doesnÃ?t allow the possibility of growth and change or the evidence to back up claims that have been made.
A logical argument in which each statement is backed up by a statement that is accepted as true is a proof.