Yes.
It means that a similar case, or cases, containing similar circumstances has been decided previously and the judge can consider this previous decision (i.e.- (precedent) in coming to his decision.
If you have been issued a ticket, there is no limit in Florida. If a ticket hasn't been issued the misdemeanor limits would probably apply.
If you have been issued a ticket, there is no limit in Ohio. If a ticket hasn't been issued the misdemeanor limits would probably apply.
In South Carolina if you have been issued a ticket, there is no limit. If a ticket hasn't been issued the misdemeanor limits would probably apply.
You can apply ... doubtful to be hired. But in order to find out, one has to have the RPh degree first, and that takes up to two years minimally.
Not enough information is disclosed on what misdemeanor charge, or what "procedure" is being referred to. However: if it is a misdemeanor traffic offense, not generally. But if it is a summary arrest situation (i.e.: you are taken into full custody) for a misdemeanor offense, the exact same procedures and constitutional protections will apply as it does in any other arrest situation.
No, the precedent set by Marbury v. Madison has not been overturned.
Relating to the law of precedents, the concept of stare decisis relates to the binding nature of an earlier decision over a subsequent court called upon to decide over a similar issue.Stare Decisis operates at two levels:1. Binding precedent (or mandatory authority); and2. Persuasive precedentBinding precedent is when a similar matter has been decided upon by a superior court, a junior or subordinate court is required to follow the ruling.Persuasive precedent is when a similar matter has been decided by a different bench of the same court, or a court of the same rank or junior / subordinate court.
No. An appeal to precedent is a type of analogy. This is the practice of using a case that has already been decided in a court of law (the precedent) as an analog with which to compare the case in question. If the case in question is sufficiently similar to the precedent, and the precedent stands on the authority of the court's ruling, then it may be argued by analogy that the case in question should receive the same ruling. It would be inconsistent, hence illogical, to treat like cases (the analogs) differently. (McGraw Hill Moral reasoning)
"Has been decided" is the correct form. For example, "The matter has been decided."
The way the question is asked: USING judicial precedent, means that the judge is following the lead of a decision in a similar case that has already been decided upon and he is ruling the same way using the other case as a guideline. If the questioner meant to ask what does SETTING judicial precedent mean. . . that means that the judge was rendering a decision in a case of a type that had never been tried, or ruled upon, in the past, and that his verdict would set the 'precedent' by which all future cases might be judged. Judges, by the way, do NOT necessarily have to follow precedent in making rulings.
SOL's only apply if the subject that committed the offense has avoided arrest. Once you've been arrested SOL's no longer apply.