Yes. Even though Iowa didn't begin issuing same-sex marriage licenses until April 3, 2009 and the state constitution of California banned same-sex marriage beginning November 5, 2008, the state of California does recognize Iowa same-sex marriages as "legal unions" pursuant to sections (a) and (c) of the California Family Code Section 308 and provides them with all the same rights and responsibilities as a legal marriage, except that they are not legally called "marriages."
California Family Code Section 308
(a) A marriage contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a marriage between two persons of the same sex contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state if the marriage was contracted prior to November 5, 2008.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, two persons of the same sex who contracted a marriage on or after November 5, 2008, that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they derive from the California Constitution, the United States Constitution, statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses with the sole exception of the designation of "marriage."
Yes. Even though Vermont didn't begin issuing same-sex marriage licenses until September 1, 2009 and the state constitution of California banned same-sex marriage beginning November 5, 2008, the state of California does recognize Vermont same-sex marriages as "legal unions" pursuant to sections (a) and (c) of the California Family Code Section 308 and provides them with all the same rights and responsibilities as a legal marriage, except that they are not legally called "marriages."
California Family Code Section 308
(a) A marriage contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a marriage between two persons of the same sex contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state if the marriage was contracted prior to November 5, 2008.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, two persons of the same sex who contracted a marriage on or after November 5, 2008, that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they derive from the California Constitution, the United States Constitution, statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses with the sole exception of the designation of "marriage."
Yes, the state of Nevada recognizes out-of-state same-sex marriages as of October 6, 2014, as long as the marriage was legal in the state it was performed in.
Yes, same-sex marriages legally performed in California are recognized in Vermont.
Yes, same-sex marriages legally performed in Connecticut are recognized in Vermont.
Yes, same-sex marriages legally performed in Massachusetts are recognized in Vermont.
Yes, same-sex marriages legally performed in Vermont are recognized in Iowa.
Yes, same-sex marriages legally performed in Vermont are recognized in Washington, DC.
Yes, same-sex marriages legally performed in New York are recognized in Vermont.
Yes. Pursuant to Governor Lincoln Chafee's Executive Order (no. 12-02, signed 5/14/12), the state of Rhode Island officially recognizes out-of-state same-sex marriages as legal marriages for the purposes of Rhode Island state law.
Yes, out-of-state same-sex marriages are legal under Colorado state law effective October 6, 2014.
Yes. Beginning October 6, 2014, all out-of-state same-sex marriages are valid under Wisconsin state law.
Yes. The Attorney General of Maryland issued an opinion on February 24, 2010 stating that Maryland law can recognize same-sex marriages legally performed in other states. This opinion is binding on Maryland state agencies. Same-sex couples will be able to legally marry in Maryland beginning January 1, 2013.
Yes, Washington DC recognizes civil unions performed in other states, including those from Vermont, pursuant to the Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination of Parentage Act of 2009. They are treated as legal marriages in Washington, DC.
No. The state of Wisconsin does not recognize civil unions performed in other states.