When you lift a brick and throw it, nobody asks which inertial frame of reference you are using. No.
the first law of motion deals with inertia. it describes about the inertia or the tendency of a body to remain in rest or uniform motion.more over, implicit in the discussion of Newton's first law is the concept of an inertial reference frame, which for the purposes of Newtonian mechanics is defined to be a reference frame in which Newton's first law holds true.There is a class of frames of reference (called inertial frames) relative to which the motion of a particle not subject to forces is a straight line.hence newtons first law is also called law of inertia.
because position of a particle in a wave (performing oscillations) is dependent on both time and the energy it is recieving.....
Yes, there are a number of different methods and instruments that can measure particle size. The method of testing and type of instrumentation required is partly dependent on the form of the sample to be measured for example; sprays, droplets, powders, suspensions.
It is a property, like mass. Not a particle. The electron and proton charges are considered to be the reference charges (-e and +e).
That their was a unit of charge, for which no smaller amount of charge could exist, was first suggested in the late 1800s. In 1896, J.J. Thomson showed that a negatively charged particle was a fundamental particle of nature -- ie, that electrons had a particle nature. Louis de Broglie, in his 1924 thesis, suggested that electrons also had a wave nature, with a wavelength dependent on a particle's momentum. Experiments in 1927 showed that he was correct.
It isn't clear what you mean by "its" inertial particle. There is no inertial particle associated with the photon.
In a vacuum, a photon can ONLY move at the speed of light. A regular particle can ONLY move at speeds less than the speed of light.
a few degrees before the particle become energy. it could change, dependent on the resistance of the particle for heatness.
Drift velocity refers to a particle's average velocity being influenced by its electric field. Momentum relaxation time is the time required for the inertial momentum of a particle to become negligible.
The magnitude of the electric potential is dependent upon the particle's charge and the electric field strength.
The magnitude of the electric potential is dependent upon the particle's charge and the electric field strength.
"c" is usually used, in this context, for the speed of light. If such a particle has the speed of light in one frame of reference, then, strange as it may seem, it will have the speed of light in ANY frame of reference.
the first law of motion deals with inertia. it describes about the inertia or the tendency of a body to remain in rest or uniform motion.more over, implicit in the discussion of Newton's first law is the concept of an inertial reference frame, which for the purposes of Newtonian mechanics is defined to be a reference frame in which Newton's first law holds true.There is a class of frames of reference (called inertial frames) relative to which the motion of a particle not subject to forces is a straight line.hence newtons first law is also called law of inertia.
If anything is acting on a partilce, it will keep moving along a straight line, with constant velocity (in all the inertial reference frames). In this sense, nothing causes the motion.A change in this kind of motion, that is, an acceleration or a curve in the trajectory, is caused by a force, according to the Newton equation F = dp/dt. "Nowadays" we prefer to avoid the concept of force F, using instead the idea of field, which is independet from the particle and from its parameters (mass, charge, ... ): you can say that the field permeate the space, whether the particle is there or not.
The position of the particle can be given by a number representing the distance of the particle from some fixed reference point (called the origin). This is not enough to describe the motion of the particle since for that you also required the time (or times) at which the particle is at any particular point.
because position of a particle in a wave (performing oscillations) is dependent on both time and the energy it is recieving.....
You may be referring to the 'fictitious' Coriolis effect or more correctly, Coriolis force. The Coriolis force is a fictitious force that arises from viewing things from the perspective of a rotating reference frame. When viewed from the perspective of an inertial frame, the "force" doesn't appear. We (on Earth) tend to use rotating reference frames because this view is convenient for describing behaviors that nearly co-rotate with Earth. Jeannie Heroux