this answer is based on the income of both parties. with joint custody, generally neither party pays support, but supports the child 100% when in their care. However, if one parent makes 21K a year and the other parent makes 100K a year, the parent making considerably more should contribute to the other party making the child's home and needs equally comfortable.
Sometimes, neither parent. However, usually one parent is designated as having primary custody and, typically, is awarded some support.
Yes. Both parents are legally responsible for he support of their minor child[ren].
If you're in the US... The parents (be they minors or not) of the baby are the only ones responsible for financially supporting the child. Hope they have jobs.
The father of the unborn child is obligated to pay child support once parentage is established through the voluntary acknowledgement of the male or by an order of the court. The father of the pregnant daughter has no legal obligation to support her child, but does have a legal obligation to support her until she reaches the age of majority for the state in which she resides or the terms of a standing child support order are completed, amended or rescinded.
No, only the biological parents are required to pay child support. Depending on the state you live in you may have to pay her alimony.
Yes, you will have to file for a change in the order but you can get it end if your child gets married. If they are in college and get married, that eliminates your duties of paying child support in most states.
A step father has no legal obligation to support a step child.
Yes, in some cases a minor can be emancipated if they have the support of someone else, such as a relative or guardian. The supporting individual would need to demonstrate to the court that they can provide financial and emotional support for the minor as part of the emancipation process.
Of course. Her sexual preferences have nothing to do with her right to be supported by her parents and the father's obligation to support her financially.Of course. Her sexual preferences have nothing to do with her right to be supported by her parents and the father's obligation to support her financially.Of course. Her sexual preferences have nothing to do with her right to be supported by her parents and the father's obligation to support her financially.Of course. Her sexual preferences have nothing to do with her right to be supported by her parents and the father's obligation to support her financially.
No. Child support is an obligation of a parent. The child is not obligated to contribute to their own support. An industrious child who works part time is not then burdened by her/his non-custodial parents child support obligation.No. Child support is an obligation of a parent. The child is not obligated to contribute to their own support. An industrious child who works part time is not then burdened by her/his non-custodial parents child support obligation.No. Child support is an obligation of a parent. The child is not obligated to contribute to their own support. An industrious child who works part time is not then burdened by her/his non-custodial parents child support obligation.No. Child support is an obligation of a parent. The child is not obligated to contribute to their own support. An industrious child who works part time is not then burdened by her/his non-custodial parents child support obligation.
Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.
Yes, the issue of a biological father not wanting the woman to bear the child is irrelevant and will not affect his legal obligation to support that child. Both parents of a minor child are legally obligated to financially support that child until he or she reaches the stated age of majority.
Not sure if you want to hurt him or not but it's the biological parents obligation to provide for their child regardless of how many they have. It's the child's right. And if you need benefits from the state they will go after him first. If he can not support another child he should not have gotten one or he needs to get a second job.
Yes, its both parents obligation to support their child regardless of who the child lives with unless adopted.
No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.No. You cannot shift your obligation for support to the child.
Yes, disfellowshiping does not effect the parental obligation to support and care for family members. If a child is, for whatever reason, financially dependent on his or her parents (for example due to a physical or emotional handicap) or is unable to support himself, his standing in the congregation would not necessarily mean he would forgoe financial aid from his parents. Since there is no religious mandate on this matter, the decision to support grown children or not would therefore be a personal decision.
The new marriage of either of the parents should not have any effect on a child support obligation.
No. It's always the biological parents who first has the obligation to support their child, not the state.
No, He has a moral obligation to support his child financially and emotionally. Unless his income has decreased support should remain the same.