no
no
Eddie's actions at the end of the story can be seen as justified because he was seeking closure and redemption for past mistakes. However, some may argue that his actions were extreme or unnecessary. Ultimately, it depends on the individual's perspective and interpretation of Eddie's character development throughout the story.
Eddie's actions at the end of the story can be seen as justified, as he acts out of a deep sense of love and loyalty to protect those he cares about. His choices reflect his inner struggle and the desire to find redemption for past mistakes. However, others may view his actions as impulsive and misguided, suggesting that there might have been alternative paths to resolution. Ultimately, whether his actions are justified depends on one's perspective on sacrifice and the nature of love.
no,
hindi ko alam
Whether or not Lincoln's actions were justified is a matter of opinion. His actions had two purposes: he wanted to preserve the union and he wanted to end slavery. Compare that with perhaps one million men dead. In my opinion his actions were justified. You will have to decide for yourself.
The United States wasn't at war with Japan in WW1.
Falling Action
I think that it was justified because the Americans thought that it would be a quick and easy way to end the war. I also think that it was not justified because the Americans were not thinking about their actions or the people/children that would not die and just sufer for something that they might not of done.
At the end of concluding a mystery or pointing out something based on previous actions or facts.
Falling Action
By the end of the story, I felt a sense of understanding and sympathy towards Isabella Tyson. Her actions and decisions were shaped by her circumstances and her past, and I could see the complexity of her character and the struggles she faced.