0
What else can I help you with?
How do ethical absolutists typically regard utilitarianism?
a corruption and betray of genuine ethics
Why does the agent has many more ethical duties than the broker in regard to the?
Insurance Company
What is the absolutist view on sanctity of life?
The absolutist view on the sanctity of life posits that all human life is inherently valuable and must be protected at all stages, from conception to natural death. This perspective often stems from ethical, religious, or philosophical beliefs that regard life as sacred and inviolable, asserting that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a life. Absolutists typically oppose practices like abortion, euthanasia, and capital punishment, emphasizing that life should be preserved regardless of circumstances. Ultimately, this viewpoint upholds a strict moral obligation to protect life in all situations.
Is a sacrosanct object held in a low regard?
it means that u have low regard
What standards does the legal environment in regard to ethical behavior in business?
The legal environment in regard to ethical behavior in business includes laws and regulations that govern issues such as corruption, bribery, fraud, discrimination, and environmental protection. Companies must comply with these standards to avoid legal consequences and maintain their reputation. Ethical behavior in business is important for building trust with stakeholders and operating in a socially responsible manner.
Discuss the Relevance of kant's utilitarian theory?
Kant did not have a utilitarian theory but rather a categorical imperative that utilitarians have attempted to link to Kant's theory of categorical imperative in order to reconcile the flaws that come with their own theory. Utilitarianism comes in many forms such as John Stuart Mills theory of utilitarianism, but the for the purposes of this answer we will only discuss the ethical theory behind utilitarianism. In that regard, utilitarianism theorizes that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its contribution to happiness or pleasure as summed up by the whole of humanity. Machiavelli, while not a utilitarian, had actually stated this in his manifesto the Prince, only he stated it as such: "The end justifies the means." This as an ethical theory is problematic and any ethical being knows full well that the end does not justify the means but rather it is the means that justify the end. Kant had no regard for the utilitarian theory and because of that formulated a dentological moral system to counter the utilitarianism of his day. Kant had argued that hypothetical moral systems do not persuade people to act moral because they are concerned with the outcome as a whole and do little to instruct an individual why it is in their best interest to behave morally. This dentologicalc moral system was based on his own categorical imperative which supposes that morality can be summed up in one assertion of reason. Kant defined imperative as any action or inaction that of one that is necessary. A categorical imperative then makes an unconditional requirement to behave in such a way that it is an end in and of itself rather than a justification of that end. He stated this as such: "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." The major problem with Kant's theory, although much more sound than that of utilitarianism, is in the notion that we can will universal law. We, of course, can no more will gravity than we can will the speed of light and the act of murder is not wrong because we as humanity have willed it so, it is wrong because it disparaged the right of that who was murdered to life. The law of murder is universal and applies on distant planets the same as it does here, just like gravity or the speed of light. The major problem with the ethical theory behind utilitarianism is in defining ethics as either happiness or pleasure. While happiness is indeed a moral duty it is not morality in and of itself. Pleasure, on the other hand is not a moral duty but rather a biological command to seek that which pleasures us. Sex, drugs and rock and roll can give many people pleasure but has nothing to do with morality or ethics. Out of control orgies where carnal knowledge is gained with people we have no knowledge of is not only not an ethical theory it is just plain dangerous for more than just the parties involved and as such and as pleasure it has no place in an ethical framework
What is the difference between deontological ethic and a teleological ethics?
Teleological ethical theories are consequentialist in nature because they assert that the morally correct action is one that produces the greatest balance of good over bad consequences compared with alternative actions. Deontological ethical theories are nonconsequentialist and regard the rightness or wrongness of an action as intrinsic to the action itself. There, the consequences are morally irrelevant. Utilitarianism is the best-known teleological theory. Deontological theories include Kant's categorical imperative, human rights theories, and divine command theories.
What is another name for a broker?
A broker can regard a dealer or merchant of a product or service. Automotive brokers typically regard used bulk car sellers or exporters. A broker in the finance and trade industries can regard a stock trader.
What legal and ethical issues does the Easy Jet organisation need to consider with regard to the gathering processing distribution and use of information on the Internet?
Legal issues and ethical issues needs to be researched and recommended to EasyJet. There is no particular answer for that question, and the question counts 15% so go do it!
What is the difference between work ethic and business ethic?
Work ethic is how diligently you do your job. Business ethic refers to whether your decisions are ethical or unethical with regard to business practices.
What are the ethical issues and subject areas of Micheal Crichtons novels and films?
In Mikey Crikey's* novels, very smart people - generally scientists and entrepreneurs - fool around with science and nature without due regard, or even any regard at all, for the consequences, which are usually disastrous. * Sorry, that's what I call him, fondly.
How do I define a lecher?
A lecher is someone who exhibits excessive or inappropriate sexual desire or behavior, often characterized by a lack of restraint or respect for others. This term is typically used to describe individuals, usually men, who are overtly lascivious and seek sexual gratification without regard for moral or ethical considerations. The behavior associated with lechery can be seen as vulgar or offensive.
